I am very interested in MSL (neural dynamics and internal models). The only problem is that this has already all been clarified: www.researchgate.net/publication/...

Conversely to the videoclip here is the explanation of how our brain knows the difference between a rabbit and a duck? www.researchgate.net/publication/...

Oops..............

This paper explicitly distinguishes two autonomous processes in visual working memory: content-specific maintenance in sensory areas and content-agnostic top-down control in fronto-parietal networks. I hope that neuroscience will consider the possibility that neither process is fully

Pong illustrates how behavior can be understood as a fully analog, relational process. Successful play does not arise from discrete symbolic states, but from the continuous www.researchgate.net/publication/...

Comparison process. www.researchgate.net/publication/...

"Is attention a theory?" @racheldenison.bsky.social www.researchgate.net/publication/... www.researchgate.net/publication/...

This is completely underpinned by: www.researchgate.net/publication/...

"The scope of unconscious processing has long been, and still remains, a hotly debated issue." No, it is not. The whole clarification of all conscious attention processes: www.researchgate.net/publication/... www.researchgate.net/publication/...

Pitch and time are processed autonomously. MSL (motor sequence learning) constructs templates of two autonomous phenomena: 1. the sequence items, in this case the music score, and, 2. the space between the items, in this case the rythm/space between the notes. www.researchgate.net/publication/...

Up towards "Core Perception". Can't wait. www.cambridge.org/core/journal...

“The word decision is a key word in cognitive neuroscience. But what does it mean exactly?” Indeed, the term decision intuitively points to a complete internal thought process. And that is definitely not happening. Now look at the picture of the different action trajectory

Completely underpinned in Pong: The movement of the pong ball and the paddle are mediated by the cortical streams in 2 autonomous ways. 1. The zigzag process (y-axis), and 2. the accordion process (the x-axis) which provides the tau-value. www.researchgate.net/publication/...

Oh dear — how do I break this to brain scientists, especially right before Christmas: Perception begins with continuously changing external sensory stimulation, which is immediately compared with internally

Motor skill learning is already completely explained. Throwing f.e. compels the stacking of 2 autonomous foci. Because the foci are autonomous you will never be capable of executing motor actions identically. You can only TRAIN to optimize them: www.researchgate.net/publication/...

The traditional computational paradigm is indeed broken because they are both fallacious. A third combination will not improve this.

Both articles demonstrate that the brain first predicts whether an action is feasible and likely to succeed — and only then proceeds to execute it. In grasping: www.researchgate.net/publication/...

If neuro scientists are doing research about tennis, dance, and piano playing after a while they consider themselves specialists in tennis, dance and piano playing. The truth is that they aren't and do not know anything about the execution of tennis, dance or piano playing. The brain

Rethinking Visual Attention and the Foundations of Vision Science The Müller–Lyer Figure Is Not an Illusion: www.researchgate.net/publication/...

You are extremely biased if you immediately look at the 3rd image.

The Müller–Lyer Figure Is Not an Illusion ----- When the Müller–Lyer figure appears scientific researchers are theory-driven and attentionaly conditioned to immediately shift their visual attention ....

Totally clarified by explaining how templates occur within f.e. piano playing: www.researchgate.net/publication/...

And completely underpinned by the explanatory model of the motoric movement action (2016) www.researchgate.net/publication/...

Nice physiological findings. But functionally this phenomenon is completely explained for quite some time now (2016). ----- Do these exercises and you will know it instantly. YOU HEAR ( .... = duration pause) YOU ANSWER www.researchgate.net/publication/...

There are still many misconceptions, omissions and fallacies within current visual attention science. This is the complete revelation of all our auditive and visual attentional processes; explained in one overarching ecological phenomenon. www.researchgate.net/publication/...

The brain as a comparing mechanism The brain developed exclusively under the pressure of external stimuli acting upon the organism. Of crucial importance was the capacity to deal with future situations—inevitably novel stimuli—by relating them to earlier www.researchgate.net/publication/...

The word TEMPLATE is not mentioned once? The template is the phenomenon which arises during action execution and encompasses 1. an autonomous cognitive www.researchgate.net/publication/...

Completely underpinned with scientific evidence: www.researchgate.net/publication/...

A commentary on Fleming/Michel (2025) www.researchgate.net/publication/...

There are still many misconceptions, omissions and fallacies within current visual attention science. This is the complete revelation of all our auditive and visual attentional processes; explained in one overarching ecological phenomenon. www.researchgate.net/publication/...

Very entertaining. www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MV1...

I have a very important question. I see a vivid image when I think of my deceased grandma. Can we exclude that this encompasses an efferent signal towards the retina? #skyvision

All visual and auditory attention processes are comprehensively explained by a single, continuous movement-comparison mechanism. www.researchgate.net/publication/...

Dear reader; dear scientists; dear neuro scientists. All perceptions are glued to their adjacent time frame perceptions. We perceive everything caught in lines. But the problem is: It is so engrained within our nature, you can't unsee it!!!!!!!!!!

Please, read this article!!!!!! I am trying to convey this for 10 years now and I am getting tired.

Let's make a deal scientists. In stead of focussing on what people CAN'T do under abnormal circumstances (And you will find plenty). Let us focus on what they actually DO while reading. - In this way we will never achieve anything! www.researchgate.net/publication/...

And more data, and more data, and m....................ore data, and more data,....................................and more data and more... Impressive so much data, never a functional explanation, but boy do we have much data! Sounds cynical? No!!!!!!!!!!

And completely underpinned and explained within: www.researchgate.net/publication/...

Yes, and fully explained by the explanatory model (2016). Please continue futile research.

We don't need to do this Shahab. The complete model explaining Gibson's vision is already there. It describes a third entity Gibson missed: the "empty" void between the animal and the environment (the other 2 entities).

"Timing is everything" Yes, and entirely consistent with the double and mutual process observed in the flow of a marble through a marble run, the peak of a stadium wave, or the unfolding of sounds and words within a sentence.

Car driving is really weird. You can solely manipulate something internally, and you can solely correct it externally. www.researchgate.net/publication/...

Absolutely incorrect statement and redundant research. Please, people start to study things out of your comfort zone. Pong explains it all. www.researchgate.net/publication/... www.researchgate.net/publication/...

Grasping is completely explained (but we, very sophisticated scientists, are not willing to look at a 25 min. videoclip. In stead we prefer to discuss for hours the same fallacious information about grasping what is already debunked for quite some time now). 😥😥😥

We do not anymore need scaling devices for the RHI, because all present variables are now being appointed: www.researchgate.net/publication/...

Ditto, and this is completely underpinned within the recent noval breakthrough of @chazfirestone.bsky.social @daweibai.bsky.social @veroniqueizard.bsky.social (Cognition is much more perceptual than conceptual) www.cambridge.org/core/journal...

BREAKTROUGH - BREAKTROUGH - BREAKTROUGH Call for Commentary Proposals - “Core Perception”: Re-imagining Precocious Reasoning as Sophisticated Perceiving Title: “Core Perception”: Re-imagining Precocious Reasoning as Sophisticated Perceiving My proposal: www.cambridge.org/core/journal...