Amen! Wondering how all these folks are feeling after today's testimony by the US Attorney General, for whom they vouched???

News from the bad place - see image below This is excellent news...I have seen several presentations by Drs. Knuth and Szydagis and have been very impressed by their efforts!

* Speculative thread on problematic logic in UAP related arguments 1/n * Given Ross Coulthart's recent statements (tic-tacs are LM tech that may not have been "shared" with the DoD) AND statements by Matthew Brown, Jake Barber, Tiny Klaus, Jim Semivan ("non-state actor") and others, AND

Congressman Garcia, with great respect: In yesterday's JFK assassination hearing, statements by the minority witness and by you missed the forest for the trees. 1/6

1/n #ufosky: A quasi-random thread: Why I overcame my initial reaction to Jeremy Corbell and respect his work. My primary criteria for evaluating UAP investigators: (1) apparently operates in good faith [honesty], (2) values the truth, (3) believes the public should know the truth.

Just listened to George Knapp and Jeremy Corbell interview two Australian journalists who have produced a podcast on an important case. It was great to hear from journalists new to the Phenomenon. www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVi0... Link to podcast: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/e...

Reposting an interesting item by Marik von Rennenkampff from the other place (via Jonathan Davies)

Word below from Alex Hollings on the other place that there will be a PBS special on UAP in January

This is a great summary. To this I would an an emphasis on the apparent coordination, the geographic dispersion, the fact that they fly repeatedly and at apparently only at night, and that even with repeated opportunities origin and landing have not been determined by local/state authorities.

New analysis piece by Marik von Rennenkampff in The Hill Posted at 12.30 pm ET thehill.com/opinion/5043... #UFOsky #NJDrones

A modest request: can we stop using the word "hysterical" in discussions about the #njdrones? It's loaded, antagonistic, and obscures areas of agreement ("yes, something unusual is happening, although we disagree on exactly how often"). #ufosky

As others have noted, this is interesting if ATC recording is accurate. 3 aircraft (including a United flight and Medevac flight) reported up to 4 objects, unusual/anomalous behavior (up/down, "corkscrew", out over ocean and back, extreme speed), not on FAA radar but seen on a TCAS, video exists

Warning: This is a long James Fox appreciation thread. I don't usually write such posts, but this is important. Not initially interested, almost by chance I recently watched his 2022 film, Moment of Contact.

Oops....above was intended as a reply to @declassifyuap.bsky.social post on expectations from AARO. Still learning this platform...

IMO, clever -- gather previous acknowledgements into a single statement. If AARO does not do this, would be worthwhile to add footnotes with the receipts and ask for AARO official comment. Becomes harder to pull a switch like 2021 ODNI Preliminary Report vs 2024 AARO Historical Report!

1/3: #UFOsky From last night's Senate reception organized by UAP Disclosure Fund Interesting remarks from the keynote by Sen. Mike Rounds, member both Senate Armed Services and Intelligence committees "Bipartisan approach can carry over into the next administration"

CORRECTION Hearing is on Wednesday 11/13/24

H/T for this link to @MikeDisclosure on the Other Place. All I will say is that I find it admirably direct and very impressive - no words were minced in the making of this testimony.

1 /2: I'm new to this platform and liking what I see so far. Still trying to figure out how to navigate the landscape. I may have missed it, but thus far I have not seen anything about Tim Gallaudet's written testimony submitted for the House UAP Hearing on 11/14/24