This is brilliant. www.wonkette.com/p/epa-wins-e...

Excellent reporting from Heated and a classic example of conflict of interest. Our scientists would be happy to sit down with these chefs and share how #PFAS contaminates water and impacts health.

San Francisco is taking on ultra-processed food companies for "using deceptive marketing techniques to target children ... to consume their products while knowing that overconsumption of the foods could lead to poor health outcomes..." #ultraprocessedfood abc7news.com/post/san-fra...

"This is what corporate capture looks like." - Dimitri Abrahamsson EPA is supposed to protect people from toxic chemicals like D4, not give them a pass.

Have you received a letter from "Dr. B.S."? One scientist decided to investigate and what he found may shed light on another form of corporate influence. www.nytimes.com/2025/11/04/s...

Did you know that the Tobacco Industry was behind much of the creation of ultra-processed food? Researchers are now sounding the alarm that ultra-processed food needs warning labels. www.bbc.com/news/article...

They are removing scientists from scientific advisory panels and polluting industries are jockeying for the positions. If you want to make America healthy, remove corporate interference from the regulatory process. www.eenews.net/articles/che...

Scientists and health advocates are trying to address the children's health crisis despite an EPA and administration captured by industry and corporate interests. But transparency and public support can make powerful allies. undark.org/2025/11/06/t...

BREAKING: Senate hearing on impacts of chemical regulation Thursday. Note that two of the three witnesses are from industry. At least one witness will testify on behalf of science and health. www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/se...

If you want to keep people safe from harmful chemicals, one good step would be to stop the revolving door between the chemical industry and EPA. www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...

Art + Science No. 5: Big Oil, Regulations, Global Warming, a Calculated Stitch with Ruth Tabancay via Zoom on Sunday, September 21, 4:00 to 5:30 PM PST www.eventbrite.com/e/artscience...

"Just as governments once curbed tobacco industry influence, they must now ban fossil fuel lobbying and disinformation," Miller said. phys.org/news/2025-09...

"The battle over Roundup and glyphosate, the controversial chemical it contains, is a case study in how regulation, politics and big business are intertwined in the agricultural industry."

Last week the plastics industry stopped the global plastics treaty and now it appears the pesticide industry is succeeding at keeping regulations at bay. We can make America healthy by removing polluter conflict of interest in the regulatory process. biologicaldiversity.org/w/news/press...

Medical advice should be free of financial conflicts of interest, especially when it comes to children. Important study from @drlauraschmidt.bsky.social www.statnews.com/2025/07/22/s...

There is no safe way to recycle plastics that contain thousands of toxic chemicals. Plastics treaty negotiators need to push back on industry's false narrative that we can "recycle" our way out of the plastics crisis. prheucsf.blog/2025/07/09/s... @nickchartres.bsky.social @toxicsfree.bsky.social

BREAKING: Trump's EPA appears to be backing down on repealing asbestos ban. www.nytimes.com/2025/07/07/c...

Silencing critics is part of the polluter playbook. www.nytimes.com/2025/07/03/c...

"Another problem the industry does not frequently address publicly: the pollution caused by advanced recycling. Though 'the plastics industry positions advanced recycling as an environmentally friendly solution for plastic waste', the report says, processes emit toxic and planet-warming pollutants."

"But there’s no tackling climate change and plastic pollution without addressing the underlying cause — fossil fuels."

What happens when polluters are given free rein.

They say they want to make America healthy, but what they are doing will make people sicker. It is vital to restore research funding and scientists need to be able to work without political or corporate interference.

One week from today! Learn about the corporate secrets in the UCSF Industry Documents Library and how you can use the library in your research. Register at: us02web.zoom.us/webinar/regi...

EPA science that forces polluting industries to be responsible is under attack. Dr. Woodruff testified on why EPA science is critical to health and disease prevention. @epw.senate.gov

Want to learn how we can hold health harming corporations to account? Join us 12pm PT, Thursday May 29 to hear about the work of the @UCSF Center to End Corporate Harm

The chemical industry has a long list of "asks" from the new administration. These requests will leave people exposed to more toxic chemicals and pollutants in the air, water, homes, and workplaces. Read the list. What do you think?

They are making it easier for polluters to pollute. More #airpollution means more asthma, more cardiovascular and respiratory disease, more cancer, and worse pregnancy outcomes.

Classic tactic of health-harming industries is to delay regulation. Now add another one: immunity from their products' damage.

If you're wondering why scientists are Standing Up for Science around the country today, this article has a few insights. Scientists are standing up for you and your health.

What does the science show on how large corporations impact health? And how can these health-harming industries be held accountable? Check out our latest blog for highlights from speakers at our Center to End Corporate Harm launch event. prheucsf.blog/2025/02/25/h...

IT'S OFFICIAL: Announcing the new Center to End Corporate Harm at UCSF! Read all about how science and internal industry documents will tackle corporate drivers of disease. prheucsf.blog/2025/01/16/n...