loading . . . The effects of prostate volume and PI-RADS category on optimal PSA-density thresholds for biopsy decision-making - European Radiology Objectives To evaluate the effect of prostate volume on the risk of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) across a range of PSA-density (PSAd) values, and to explore the relationship between PI-RADS category and PSAd in predicting csPCa. Materials and methods We retrospectively analyzed 2190 patients undergoing mpMRI for suspected PCa. Patients were classified as csPCa and clinically insignificant (negative and insignificant PCa). Logistic regression was performed to assess the csPCa risk at different PSAd cut-offs across different prostate volume subgroups (<β40, 40β60, 60β80, >β80βmL) and PI-RADS categories. The effect of prostate volume on PSAd performance was evaluated using ROC analysis. To assess robustness, we performed an 80:20 split-sample internal validation. Results 747/2190 (34.1%) patients had PCa, including 571 (26.1%) with csPCa. Regardless of PSAd, csPCa risk exceeded 30% for PI-RADS 4 and 50% for PI-RADS 5. At a 10% csPCa risk threshold, the optimal PSAd cut-offs were 0.20βng/mLΒ² for PI-RADS 1β2 and 0.12βng/mLΒ² for PI-RADS 3. Logistic regression showed a significant inverse correlation between prostate volume and csPCa probability. Notably, 79% of csPCa patients with prostate volume β€β40βmL had a PSAd β₯β0.15βng/mLΒ², compared to only 22.4% with volumes β₯β60βmL. PSAd performed significantly worse for larger glands (β₯β60βmL), with AUCs of 0.70 versus 0.84 (β€β40βmL) and 0.82 (40β60βmL), both pβ<β0.001. Conclusion The optimal PSAd cut-offs for guiding biopsy decisions were 0.20βng/mLΒ² for PI-RADS 1β2 and 0.12βng/mLΒ² for PI-RADS 3. When using PSAd to guide biopsy decision for PI-RADS 1β3 patients with large prostates (>β60βmL), caution is warranted, as PSAd becomes significantly less accurate. Key Points Question The optimal PSA-density thresholds for biopsy decisions in PI-RADS 1β3 patients remain uncertain, and data on the impact of prostate volume on its performance are limited. Findings Optimal PSA-density thresholds were 0.20βng/mLΒ² for PI-RADS 1β2 and 0.12βng/mLΒ² for PI-RADS 3. Diagnostic performance of PSA-density decreased significantly in men with larger glands (β₯β60βmL). Clinical relevance PSA-density cut-offs of 0.20 (PI-RADS 1β2) and 0.12βng/mLΒ² (PI-RADS 3) can guide biopsy decisions. In PI-RADS 1β3 patients with large prostate (β₯β60βmL), PSA-density becomes significantly less predictive, and low values may not reliably exclude csPCa. Graphical Abstract https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00330-025-12272-y