The entire Jewish religion is based around being the chosen, which in turn they’ve be persecuted for. That’s not a set of values worth maintaining. It’s just another form of narcissism, the MO of the Republican Party.

Our most ancient boy #iguana #petsofbluesky

Thoughts on "the matrix" as pudding... New and improved taste! #philsky #nondual #reality #fromonetoone adichotomy.com/a-matrix-redux/

We need to stop making laws that future trumpsters will loophole around and just get rid of them before the puss starts to bubble. Want to follow a law, kick out the current admin.

Nope. Language isn’t responsible for diversion from understanding reality as “it really is”. Silly that.

The nearest equivalent is the gestopo at the polls only allowing republicans to vote.

No such thing as independence from bias. Existence is bias, there’s no where to go that removes bias, no matter how many theories one invokes or tests one confirms. To that “end”, it’s all creation, even the bits we don’t play well with.

In the void, we are all the same color.

Twitter is the equivalent to what drunk dudes in wife beaters scream at tvs everyday.

The example here has driven many “mad”, they get stuck defending an absolute as an independent (in this case, places) phenomena. But as an inferred duality suggests, one can never reach a state of absolute by describing it with “other” absolute values, it requires the subtle to get there. #philsci

t's been a few years since this posting made the rounds, thought it would be good to bring it back around, due to various kerfuffles recently. #philsci #nonduality #oneofmany adichotomy.com/adichotomy-d...

The answer deep thought philosophy gives is usually unexceptable. You are the “within it”. Which means there is no independent out-there to manipulate into producing. #philsci #nondual #adichotomy

There is no separate physics for aliens, differentiation is the entire ball of wax, alien or native. #philsci #adichotomy #nondual

The reason reality is indescribable, is it would take an entire reality to describe one. #philsci #nonduality

There’s probably no division gap to grasp on to. All activities are creation, including the destructive ones.

Adding or removing states of the universe(s) is really not needed to describe reality, nor could it be the case. #philsci It’s certainly fun to ponder though.

From what I can tell, Weiss has always road the shock and horror line for clicks and cash. Useful idiot, indeed.

Likely valid, while we can parse stuff as individual, its regular order is cohesive and uninterrupted.

Nice wrapped up recap tool for Bluesky : www.madebyolof.com/bluesky-wrap...

In the exact same way there are “multiple universes”. Division is the illusion that reality is actually split up into parts. #philsci

A clear danger to himself and others. We used to do something about this. www.politico.com/news/2025/12...

You should expect as much from a liar. #philsci #philosophy #not2

It’s clear this seems counterintuitive to idealized experience, but there isn’t a cosmos out there or ID in here. No independent view from no where to confirm an expanding universe out there. It’s definitely ok/normal to make such assumptions. Yet reality is the normal, consistent, mundane. #philsky

There is ‘likely’ no independent anything to create ‘other’ stuff and be called god, even in the most traditional sense. Proof of existence isn’t proof, especially if personal awareness is not required. i.e. “I” personhood, is not some separate requirement for existence as proof. #philsci

a now moment -exposed. One never needed to learn this, but here it is anyway, an eternal reminder. #philsci adichotomy.com/a-now-moment...

I’m not sure that it’s particularly difficult here, if the experience of time is relative to the “speed of light”, then from our particular perspective (here on this planet, in this system), light speed would also appear to have a particular relatable relation of which we could measure. #philsci

In the same way you can only display knowledge, you can’t own, knowledge of anything.

There aren’t “selves” in any independent way. There is multiplicity in singulars, a duality, top to bottom, as an everywhere to go between. #philsci

Unfortunately it’s not “just biology”. Conflict and distinction is the very fiber of being, of perception, of reality. I will say, the sooner we stop trying to make it something else, the sooner we can be more collaborative.

In a typical retort to a _true origin of_ the answer is duality, a practiced mediation (or just "feeling in the zone") makes this clear. The examiner falls to the examined, the doer falls to the doing. It's not a moment of synchronization, it's an eternity of being, without breaks.

It means effortless action, or in different words, action without an independent doer. #philsci In the same vain as non-duality means duality as the only thing occurring, without some other “independent, untouched sort of thing” causing it to happen.

Instead of money though, it’s the Epstein files.

Always here, now. adichotomy.com/an-afterlife/

No need to invoke existential crisis or anything 🤪

If reality were a tangible physical reality, we would never be to meet each other. #philosophy

This page would make a good jumping in point to dualism, as non-dual. However, in as far as examination goes, the first bit describes that there are “independent” bits that comprise reality. Yet, there is likely only non-dual being (of two) ever occurring. #philsci plato.stanford.edu/entries/dual...

Totality would indeed be beyond.

There is likely no better reference to examining reality (philosophically) than the mind’s eye. It’s likely impossible to completely remove “human experience” from the equation, which includes instruments that seem to be independent from human influence. When examined this way, the inquiry is absurd

This is largely an inaccurate assumption about dualism from the onset. It’s fair to dismiss or dislike the implication, but more likely so when the premise is as obtuse as presented. We can infer duality in the same vain as a fundamental physical reality and still end up in the same space.

Explore ourselves and our reality with a concentric mind. #philsci #PhilosophySky adichotomy.com/a-narrative-...

The Tao challenges the ideology of physical things as fundamental some nearly 3000 years ago, if age means anything to anyone. To come full circle #philsci

Ever onwards. adichotomy.com/a-fundamenta...

Reality is a trickster. So immersed in feeling and natural progression we simply don’t notice the elephant in the room. ✌🏼

There is likely no independent being, which includes space/time to exhibit a foundation for being. At best we can infer it’s dual “nature” and call it good. #philsci

Any important observation is one is not just an object but also the subject “as experience”. This is why objectification (especially of people) is tiresome and rude.

Being raised a Jew, they puzzle over theology because is a story, just like any other. Silly to imagine otherwise. #philsci

God is in the details. There is likely no independent entity, in an independent location that provided a creation narrative for wholly dependent individuals. It’s not complex or particularly obtuse to find this to be honest.

A simple, basic truth about reality, is one has zero need to understand something about it or to communicate anything toward precedence of it, and that is a beautiful truth. #philsci

You can’t “get rid” of an ailing society. All attempts just enchances those ails. An even poorer, lazier solution to the problem. I don’t think man-child’ing your way through life is useful to anyone. Do the work to bolster each other or sit down and stfu.

I’d rather be dead, then deal with this flex fuckery daily.