I really enjoyed my MLST chat with Tim @neuripsconf.bsky.social about the research we've been doing on reasoning, robustness and human feedback. If you have an hour to spare and are interested in AI robustness, it may be worth a listen 🎧 Check it out at youtu.be/DL7qwmWWk88?...

"Rather than being animals that *think*, we are *animals* that think"; the last sentence of Tom Griffiths's characterisation of human intelligence through limited time, compute, and communication hits different today than it did 4 years ago.

Sometimes o1's thinking time almost feels like a slight. o1 is like "oh I thought about this uninvolved question of yours for 7 seconds and here is my 20 page essay on it"

What counts as in-context learning (ICL)? Typically, you might think of it as learning a task from a few examples. However, we’ve just written a perspective (arxiv.org/abs/2412.03782) suggesting interpreting a much broader spectrum of behaviors as ICL! Quick summary thread: 1/7

Big congratulations to Dr. @jumelet.bsky.social for obtaining his PhD today and crafting a beautiful thesis full of original and insightful work!! 🎉 arxiv.org/pdf/2411.16433?

I'll be at NeurIPS tues-sun, send me a message if you'd like to chat!

This is an incredible paper that I've longed to do for a long time. However the engineering challenges were far too daunting, so my collaborators and I settled for indirect evidence for this hypothesis instead (or did other things).

Do you know what rating you’ll give after reading the intro? Are your confidence scores 4 or higher? Do you not respond in rebuttal phases? Are you worried how it will look if your rating is the only 8 among 3’s? This thread is for you.

How do LLMs learn to reason from data? Are they ~retrieving the answers from parametric knowledge🦜? In our new preprint, we look at the pretraining data and find evidence against this: Procedural knowledge in pretraining drives LLM reasoning ⚙️🔢 🧵⬇️