I've read Hot Allostatic Load now, and I'm woker than this: The highbies are also doing witch burnings and sexual assault

The problem with trans discourse online is that beautiful punk she/theys are being corrupted by evil highbies into becoming cops/southern belles/domestic trans

communism is always like 'if we get rid of the proletariat we will solve class oppression"

be so for real right now

This is a deeply cruel way of seeing queerness that exists only as a way to beg acceptance from cis and hetero people on the condition they get to be accepted as properly identifiable people while all other queer groups can choke and die. The idea that people in the closet shouldn't be fought for is

like come oooooooooonnnnnn

How are you people so fucking self-centred and stupid holy shit

I'm so happy I mog all evil trans women

"Conservatives love femboys" Are you fucking stupid? Like the pederasty thing aside (Which is also really stupid) do you really think the average conservative doesn't just treat femboys like they are the average trans person?

Just randomly dogging on trans mascs for no reason lmao these people really can't hide their bigotry. "Oh when I use degendering to mean when a queer I don't like asks my pronouns I'm doing it correctly but when you use it its bad and wrong and I have to educate you"

This account stands for: Total Gender Abolition Non-Binary Power The Divine Supremacy of the Androgynous Form The Transgression and Defilement of all Things Empowerment of the Perverted Excluded Inhuman Monsters Total Anti-Sociality Deflowerment of Moral Virtue Left Anti-Feminism

Gender isn't real :3 Transness and cishood are different things :3

Day 3. The Princess not the first, not the last #slaytober #slaytober2025 #slaytheprincess

Non-Binary people should respond to the whole TIRF/Radfem/Gacc schtick by acting like this

Children deserve to be emancipated from the authoritarian control of adults

True liberation is anti-social

Abolishing gender, despite what theorists like Vikky Storm might say, will indeed abolish gender identity as a grouping of social performances and signifiers. Iconoclasm means iconoclasm.

delirious. All liberals really do have bats in their belfry. Should I even bother to argue? To say "No thats clearly not what I meant"? It's clear that I also mean that biological sex isn't real, that trans women are women and that gender abolitionism doesn't affect that, so what is it?

If you get offended by being called a klansfem that just means the shoe fits, sorry but I calls it as I sees it

Stop and think about why so many of these types of trans accounts constantly reinforce the idea that radical queer people are actually reactionaries. It always about throwing suspicion at more radical queer politics with this fake "no they are actually transphobic theyfabs" shit.

This is reactionary, annihilate the concept of womanhood!

I think cis women are women in a gender is fake, words mean nothing way and you should too. A body isnt meant to be or do anything and "woman" is an idealist category that anyone that identifies as one plays towards. Affirming womanhood as a material, essential thing, that people are, is reactionary

Liberation movements need to discard the liberal theory that used to guide them, and instead pick up true liberators, like Nietzsche, Bataille, Stirner and Marinetti. Futurism and Individualist Anarchism has much more potential than any enlightenment value.

The left needs an impurity culture, a desecration culture, a violence culture. Progressivism has to be more offensive, it has to destroy.

Pacifism is self-enslavement

Any defense of parenting is inherently a defense of abuse.

Sanism and transphobia are intrinsically linked

ACAB includes psychologists, psychiatrists, therapists.

New profile pic, using this one here so I can mog all the libs but don't worry I'm not a chud

Does she know?

ACAB includes psychologists, psychiatrists, therapists.

I think the bad criticism people levy at Hazbin Hotel exemplifies exactly how most progressives see carcerality and "rehabilition". No one actually believes or wants harmful people to change and be redemeed, they don't believe that. What they believe is that there are people who *are* "good" but/

They would not say that like that

Weak, I can do this easily

"Whoever has to count on the lack of will in others in order to exist is a shoddy product of these others, as the master is a shoddy product of the slave. If servility ceased, it would be all over for lordship." - Max Stirner, The Unique and It's Property

You people are weak.

The purpose of sociability and systems of social belonging are not to allow an individual's wellbeing, but instead to protect the structure of the social itself. The social is never object of criticism, even when the social space projects harm it is deemed anti-social to go against it, for example,-

I firmly believe that if you want there to be less abusers that taking the position that abusers can't possibly change and will always have an anti-social antagonic relation to other people is not just extensively counterproductive but also pro-abuse.

It is not that the void -or creative nothing- is nothing at all, oblivion, only that the system of rationality cannot reach, it is nothing to words. Viscerally, it is infinite potential.

>Sees blonde white woman >Getting big trans woman vibes from this

New text out ioooo.substack.com/p/post-progr...

If we are to propose the idea that liberation comes through the undoing of repression then it should be understood that it is one's position in the hegemon that defines the structure of repression. (1/4)

Libertarians, despite arguing that capitalism is the ideology of the self-interested do in fact understand that communists are themselves very self-interested. After all, what do they resort calling communists? They call them lazy, greedy, parasites, for those aren't their crimes that of egoism? +

She's so based............

Aww, you can't handle iconoclasm done to your icons? Are you upset? upset that I'm threading over your sacred thing? Does it make you feel sad, that I can just reach over your icon and toss it away as nothing? That what you held untouchable I trample over like dirt? Pathetic~

I really dislike "Androids/Cyborgs/AI as a metaphor for identity group" as a theme, I find that the biggest potential in AI is how it can destabilize the category of human but the eugenic norm in science fiction tends to create narratives that only reify humanist essentialism.

I think I will just use bluesky to theory post every once in a while. So uh, I think going forwards its necessary to articulate some form of "Post-Progressivism" like Newman's "Postanarchism" since mainstream progressive ideas are too strongly rooted in liberal ideology and philosophy.