Excited to see an advance version piece - using public policy ideas to rethink JR - up online now. academic.oup.com/ojls/advance... It’s part of a bigger project so if interested to discuss please drop me a line. (Or pass on to anyone you think might have an interest!)

Any politicians concerned about JR undermining government can allay their concern by spending a day reading new Admin Court judgments - it’s just relentless appeals against extradition and professional misconduct decisions.

JR bingo here! Nearly a full house!

www.bbc.co.uk/news/article... Doubt this’ll be the last of these.

I’m yet to be convinced that ‘leaving stuff’ constitutes a coherent and sufficient policy package. It seems some differ, including those who ought to know better.

Come and join us at Oxford Brookes Law School! We’re a lovely friendly department, with several permanent Lecturer and Senior Lecturer posts: www.jobs.ac.uk/job/DOJ986/l... www.jobs.ac.uk/job/DOJ993/s...

90% of prisoners are locally born, wld be another way of putting it.

It’s the bit where McSweeney scrawls ‘let Starmer be Starmer’ on a napkin, and then everything’s grand.

It would be a better world if reporting on the Supreme Court trans decision could avoid suggesting that the court has some magic power to define words in general. How long would it take to say ‘in the Equality Act’?

New post | The principle of legality and heightened-scrutiny rationality review: The Supreme Court’s judgment in the Spitalfields case publiclawforeveryone.com/2025/03/28/t...