loading . . . 8(a) program pushed further to the edge by DoD audit
var config_5793910 = {"options":{"theme":"hbidc_default"},"extensions":{"Playlist":[]},"episode":{"media":{"mp3":"https:\/\/mgln.ai\/e\/345\/rss.art19.com\/episodes\/3921f587-96e4-46a3-82c6-730ac6909c8c.mp3?rss_browser=BAhJIg5Xb3JkUHJlc3MGOgZFVA%3D%3D--466d26bc6c0e932b4a48b1403433bf1814d4975e"},"coverUrl":"https:\/\/federalnewsnetwork.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/The-Federal-Drive-with-Terry-Gerton-Podcast-Cover-150x150.png","title":"DoD looks to audit 8(a) sole source contracts","description":"[hbidcpodcast podcastid='5793910']nnThe 8(a) small business contracting program is coming under the microscope of its biggest user.nnThe Defense Department is joining a growing list of agencies auditing the use of sole-source contracts through the 8(a) program.nnExperts warn that DoD\u2019s decision to launch this new audit signals that this 40-year-old small business development program is teetering further on the edge.nn\u201cIt's not a death knell, but it's absolutely going to leave a mark. It's absolutely going to hinder our ability to bring some of that new technology, that new manufacturing capability to the federal marketplace. That's probably my bigger concern,\u201d said Norm Abdallah, executive vice president at Hui Huliau, a Native Hawaiian-owned firm in the 8(a) program, in an interview with Federal News Network. \u201cWe're behind in terms of the ability to manufacture here in the U.S., and have outsourced that beyond what one should in the defense of their own country, and so hindering the ability for us to help bring some of that to bear in the U.S. marketplace is probably the biggest concern.\u201dnnAbdallah said the 8(a) program is an avenue for companies to enter the market, obtain past performance experience in the federal sector and learn the ropes so DoD, and really every agency\u2019s, ongoing distrust and scrutiny of the program is likely going to impact the government in bigger ways than expected.nnSecretary Pete Hegseth posted a <a href="https:\/\/x.com\/SecWar\/status\/2012302240594170106?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noopener">video on X<\/a> on Friday explaining that the Pentagon is worried about two main things: The 8(a) program is a diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) program, and it\u2019s wrought with fraud.n<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">n<p dir="ltr" lang="en">We are taking a sledgehammer to the oldest DEI program in the federal government\u2014the 8(a) program. <a href="https:\/\/t.co\/c9iH8gcqG7">pic.twitter.com\/c9iH8gcqG7<\/a><\/p>n\u2014 Secretary of War Pete Hegseth (@SecWar) <a href="https:\/\/twitter.com\/SecWar\/status\/2012302240594170106?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 16, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote>n<script async src="https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"><\/script>nn\u201cProviding these small businesses with opportunities is a laudable goal, but over the decades, as it happens, the 8(a) program has morphed into swamp code words for DEI, race-based contracting. And here's the worst part, in many, many instances, these socially disadvantaged businesses, they don't even do work. They take a 10%, 20%, sometimes 50% fee off the top, and then pass the contract off to a giant consulting firm, commonly known as beltway bandits. For decades, this program, 8(a) has been a breeding ground for fraud, and this administration is finally doing something about it,\u201d Hegseth said. \u201cEffective immediately, I'm ordering a line-by-line review of every small business sole source, 8(a) contract that is over $20 million, and we'll look at everything smaller than that too. The Department of War has the biggest chunk of 8(a) spending by far, 10 times more than any other agency. So our cleanup, it's going to be 10 times tougher.\u201dnn<iframe id="datawrapper-chart-gdtpE" style="width: 0; min-width: 100% !important; border: none;" title="Total obligations for DoD 8(a) and 8(a) sole source contract awards" src="https:\/\/datawrapper.dwcdn.net\/gdtpE\/3\/" height="389" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" aria-label="Grouped Bars" data-external="1"><\/iframe><script type="text\/javascript">window.addEventListener("message",function(a){if(void 0!==a.data["datawrapper-height"]){var e=document.querySelectorAll("iframe");for(var t in a.data["datawrapper-height"])for(var r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if(r.contentWindow===a.source){var d=a.data["datawrapper-height"][t]+"px";r.style.height=d}}});<\/script>nnDoD\u2019s audit will include two phases. Hegseth said if a contract doesn't make meet the DoD\u2019s goal of increasing lethality, they will terminate it.nn\u201cWe have no room in our budget for wasteful DEI contracts that don't help us win wars, period, full stop. Second, we're doing away with these pass through schemes. We'll make sure that every small business getting a contract is the one actually doing the work, and not just some shell company funneling your money to a giant consulting firm,\u201d he said. \u201cThis approach is, of course, not meant to hurt small businesses, and that's not the point. America is full of great, amazing small businesses. This is part of a larger effort to transform our acquisition ecosystem into one that makes sense for the threats we face in the 21st century.\u201dnnAn email to DoD seeking more details about the audit and a timeline for the audit wasn\u2019t returned.nnExperts say Hegseth\u2019s decision to review sole source contracts worth at least $20 million is directed at Native American, Alaskan Native, Hawaiian Native and other tribal companies. Congress raised the sole source threshold for these firms to $100 million from $22 million in 2020. Firms not belonging to one of these groups have a sole source threshold of $5.5 million for manufacturing and $8.5 million for non-manufacturing contracts. These non-tribal or native firms can receive a sole source contract up to $20 million with certain justifications and approvals.nn<iframe id="datawrapper-chart-Ieqkf" style="width: 0; min-width: 100% !important; border: none;" title="Total number of awards for DoD 8(a) and 8(a) sole source contract awards" src="https:\/\/datawrapper.dwcdn.net\/Ieqkf\/3\/" height="362" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" aria-label="Grouped Bars" data-external="1"><\/iframe><script type="text\/javascript">window.addEventListener("message",function(a){if(void 0!==a.data["datawrapper-height"]){var e=document.querySelectorAll("iframe");for(var t in a.data["datawrapper-height"])for(var r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if(r.contentWindow===a.source){var d=a.data["datawrapper-height"][t]+"px";r.style.height=d}}});<\/script>nnWhile experts say Congress may not act to change the law, the ongoing audits by the <a href="https:\/\/federalnewsnetwork.com\/acquisition-policy\/2025\/12\/sba-audit-lawsuit-puts-8a-program-deeper-in-cross-hairs\/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Small Business Administration<\/a>, the Treasury Department, the General Services Administration and now DoD are sending signals that, at least for sole source contracts, the program doesn\u2019t work.nnA former DoD acquisition executive, who requested anonymity because their current company still does business with DoD, said he believes federal small business goals are at risk across the board, and while they may not be affected this year, in two to four years, agencies will see a huge reduction in their industrial base.nnThe former DoD executive said the administration is sending an inconsistent message to the federal contracting community. The audits and the reduction of staff in small business offices are sending one message that small businesses aren\u2019t important. But then the White House, and DoD particularly, are expressing the desire to attract new participants to the federal market, including non-traditional companies. The executive said these companies typically depend on small business offices and programs like 8(a) to help them get a foot in the door.nnJohn Shoraka, a former associate administrator of government contracting and business development at SBA and now the co-founder and managing director of GovContractPros, an advisory services firm specializing in federal procurement, said DoD\u2019s audit is part of a concerted effort by the administration to <a href="https:\/\/federalnewsnetwork.com\/acquisition-policy\/2025\/10\/sba-sends-another-shot-across-8a-program-bow\/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">undermine the 8(a) program<\/a>.nn\u201cI think if you look at the dollars in the 8(a) program, especially at DoD, some will point to the fact that they actually went up in 2025. But the challenge that we saw across a lot of our clients was that offer letters that have to go through the district office in order for a sole source award to happen were being held up and or never being processed. So we saw a slowdown in sole source awards,\u201d he said. "I think given what we've seen with respect to the SBA audit, given what we've seen with respect to the number of 8(a)s being approved, in 2024 there was something like 500 plus 8(a)s approved. In 2025, I think the last count I saw was 66 approved. So given the audits, the slowdown in processing, I think contracting officers are looking over their shoulders. I think in the short term, given the current administration and the current congressional makeup, if you will, we will see a trend away from the 8(a) program.\u201dnnDoD\u2019s decision to audit the 8(a) program comes after Treasury and SBA announced similar audits earlier this fall. SBA is looking at the entire program and companies had to submit data to the agency by Monday.nnThe SBA general counsel\u2019s office is driving the audit, which is unusual because usually these things are either done by the inspector general or program office.n<h2>Fraud, DEI concerns unfounded<\/h2>nShoraka said while the questions being asked by SBA, and now eventually DoD, are legitimate questions, the approach is causing some chaos.nn\u201cA lot of our clients reached out to their district office and the district office was actually unaware that those letters had originally gone out with respect to the audit, so there was a disconnect there. The field offices aren't sure how the data is going to be used, or who's going to use it, or what they're looking at,\u201d he said. \u201cFrom my perspective, given the types of questions that were asked, I think it leads to the question, are there pass throughs happening? Because there was a lot of questions with respect to, who are your subcontractors, who are your vendors, et cetera. So the question is, and I think what SBA was looking at is, are there pass throughs and who's really in control? Is the disadvantaged individual really owning, operating and benefiting from the 8(a) company? And I think those are legitimate questions. But again, there are legitimate processes and mechanisms to monitor that, including the annual review, which occurs every year on every single 8(a) company.\u201dnnThe former DoD acquisition executive said while there are concerns about the use of sole source awards over $20 million to tribal companies, the allegations of fraud and the belief that the 8(a) program is a DEI program are unfounded. He said DoD should go to Congress and change the law to reduce the risk of large sole source contracts turning into pass throughs.nnExperts agreed that while no program is perfect and there probably are some challenges, the 8(a) program is typically well overseen and maintained.nnIn fact, Abdallah, from Hui Huliau, said most 8(a) firms spend a lot of time meeting the compliance requirements. But he said it\u2019s also a shared responsibility for oversight with the government.nn\u201cThere are several folks that have responsibility in there. The first one is the contracting officer. In some cases, they've got to approve subcontracts. But more basically, with SBA, we go through a review every year where we have to submit our financials, what work did we do and what work happened?\u201d he said. \u201cThey worry about the business mix, how much of your work was set aside versus not set aside? Quite honestly, what means you got the work by some means other than the 8(a) program, be that a subcontractor to another straight commercial, et cetera. So there are lots of hooks to watch it. Do they audit the books, per se, to check for percentages? That's less common. But it's part of your overall review.\u201dnnShoraka added there are a significant number of regulations or requirements to mitigate the risk of pass throughs, and most rules allow for legitimate subcontracting.nnOne thing all of the experts pointed out is that the program is set up to help the 8(a) firm grow and learn, but they still have to do at least 51% of the work under services contracts and 15% of the work under construction contracts.nnShoraka said what is being lost in this entire discussion is there is more fraud in non-small business socio-economic programs across government than there are in the 8(a) and other small businesses initiatives."}};
The 8(a) small business contracting program is coming under the microscope of its biggest user.
The Defense Department is joining a growing list of agencies auditing the use of sole-source contracts through the 8(a) program.
Experts warn that DoD’s decision to launch this new audit signals that this 40-year-old small business development program is teetering further on the edge.
“It’s not a death knell, but it’s absolutely going to leave a mark. It’s absolutely going to hinder our ability to bring some of that new technology, that new manufacturing capability to the federal marketplace. That’s probably my bigger concern,” said Norm Abdallah, executive vice president at Hui Huliau, a Native Hawaiian-owned firm in the 8(a) program, in an interview with Federal News Network. “We’re behind in terms of the ability to manufacture here in the U.S., and have outsourced that beyond what one should in the defense of their own country, and so hindering the ability for us to help bring some of that to bear in the U.S. marketplace is probably the biggest concern.”
Abdallah said the 8(a) program is an avenue for companies to enter the market, obtain past performance experience in the federal sector and learn the ropes so DoD, and really every agency’s, ongoing distrust and scrutiny of the program is likely going to impact the government in bigger ways than expected.
Secretary Pete Hegseth posted a video on X on Friday explaining that the Pentagon is worried about two main things: The 8(a) program is a diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) program, and it’s wrought with fraud.
We are taking a sledgehammer to the oldest DEI program in the federal government—the 8(a) program. pic.twitter.com/c9iH8gcqG7
— Secretary of War Pete Hegseth (@SecWar) January 16, 2026
“Providing these small businesses with opportunities is a laudable goal, but over the decades, as it happens, the 8(a) program has morphed into swamp code words for DEI, race-based contracting. And here’s the worst part, in many, many instances, these socially disadvantaged businesses, they don’t even do work. They take a 10%, 20%, sometimes 50% fee off the top, and then pass the contract off to a giant consulting firm, commonly known as beltway bandits. For decades, this program, 8(a) has been a breeding ground for fraud, and this administration is finally doing something about it,” Hegseth said. “Effective immediately, I’m ordering a line-by-line review of every small business sole source, 8(a) contract that is over $20 million, and we’ll look at everything smaller than that too. The Department of War has the biggest chunk of 8(a) spending by far, 10 times more than any other agency. So our cleanup, it’s going to be 10 times tougher.”
window.addEventListener("message",function(a){if(void 0!==a.data["datawrapper-height"]){var e=document.querySelectorAll("iframe");for(var t in a.data["datawrapper-height"])for(var r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if(r.contentWindow===a.source){var d=a.data["datawrapper-height"][t]+"px";r.style.height=d}}});
DoD’s audit will include two phases. Hegseth said if a contract doesn’t make meet the DoD’s goal of increasing lethality, they will terminate it.
“We have no room in our budget for wasteful DEI contracts that don’t help us win wars, period, full stop. Second, we’re doing away with these pass through schemes. We’ll make sure that every small business getting a contract is the one actually doing the work, and not just some shell company funneling your money to a giant consulting firm,” he said. “This approach is, of course, not meant to hurt small businesses, and that’s not the point. America is full of great, amazing small businesses. This is part of a larger effort to transform our acquisition ecosystem into one that makes sense for the threats we face in the 21st century.”
An email to DoD seeking more details about the audit and a timeline for the audit wasn’t returned.
Experts say Hegseth’s decision to review sole source contracts worth at least $20 million is directed at Native American, Alaskan Native, Hawaiian Native and other tribal companies. Congress raised the sole source threshold for these firms to $100 million from $22 million in 2020. Firms not belonging to one of these groups have a sole source threshold of $5.5 million for manufacturing and $8.5 million for non-manufacturing contracts. These non-tribal or native firms can receive a sole source contract up to $20 million with certain justifications and approvals.
window.addEventListener("message",function(a){if(void 0!==a.data["datawrapper-height"]){var e=document.querySelectorAll("iframe");for(var t in a.data["datawrapper-height"])for(var r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if(r.contentWindow===a.source){var d=a.data["datawrapper-height"][t]+"px";r.style.height=d}}});
While experts say Congress may not act to change the law, the ongoing audits by the Small Business Administration, the Treasury Department, the General Services Administration and now DoD are sending signals that, at least for sole source contracts, the program doesn’t work.
A former DoD acquisition executive, who requested anonymity because their current company still does business with DoD, said he believes federal small business goals are at risk across the board, and while they may not be affected this year, in two to four years, agencies will see a huge reduction in their industrial base.
The former DoD executive said the administration is sending an inconsistent message to the federal contracting community. The audits and the reduction of staff in small business offices are sending one message that small businesses aren’t important. But then the White House, and DoD particularly, are expressing the desire to attract new participants to the federal market, including non-traditional companies. The executive said these companies typically depend on small business offices and programs like 8(a) to help them get a foot in the door.
John Shoraka, a former associate administrator of government contracting and business development at SBA and now the co-founder and managing director of GovContractPros, an advisory services firm specializing in federal procurement, said DoD’s audit is part of a concerted effort by the administration to undermine the 8(a) program.
“I think if you look at the dollars in the 8(a) program, especially at DoD, some will point to the fact that they actually went up in 2025. But the challenge that we saw across a lot of our clients was that offer letters that have to go through the district office in order for a sole source award to happen were being held up and or never being processed. So we saw a slowdown in sole source awards,” he said. “I think given what we’ve seen with respect to the SBA audit, given what we’ve seen with respect to the number of 8(a)s being approved, in 2024 there was something like 500 plus 8(a)s approved. In 2025, I think the last count I saw was 66 approved. So given the audits, the slowdown in processing, I think contracting officers are looking over their shoulders. I think in the short term, given the current administration and the current congressional makeup, if you will, we will see a trend away from the 8(a) program.”
DoD’s decision to audit the 8(a) program comes after Treasury and SBA announced similar audits earlier this fall. SBA is looking at the entire program and companies had to submit data to the agency by Monday.
The SBA general counsel’s office is driving the audit, which is unusual because usually these things are either done by the inspector general or program office.
Fraud, DEI concerns unfounded
Shoraka said while the questions being asked by SBA, and now eventually DoD, are legitimate questions, the approach is causing some chaos.
“A lot of our clients reached out to their district office and the district office was actually unaware that those letters had originally gone out with respect to the audit, so there was a disconnect there. The field offices aren’t sure how the data is going to be used, or who’s going to use it, or what they’re looking at,” he said. “From my perspective, given the types of questions that were asked, I think it leads to the question, are there pass throughs happening? Because there was a lot of questions with respect to, who are your subcontractors, who are your vendors, et cetera. So the question is, and I think what SBA was looking at is, are there pass throughs and who’s really in control? Is the disadvantaged individual really owning, operating and benefiting from the 8(a) company? And I think those are legitimate questions. But again, there are legitimate processes and mechanisms to monitor that, including the annual review, which occurs every year on every single 8(a) company.”
The former DoD acquisition executive said while there are concerns about the use of sole source awards over $20 million to tribal companies, the allegations of fraud and the belief that the 8(a) program is a DEI program are unfounded. He said DoD should go to Congress and change the law to reduce the risk of large sole source contracts turning into pass throughs.
Experts agreed that while no program is perfect and there probably are some challenges, the 8(a) program is typically well overseen and maintained.
In fact, Abdallah, from Hui Huliau, said most 8(a) firms spend a lot of time meeting the compliance requirements. But he said it’s also a shared responsibility for oversight with the government.
“There are several folks that have responsibility in there. The first one is the contracting officer. In some cases, they’ve got to approve subcontracts. But more basically, with SBA, we go through a review every year where we have to submit our financials, what work did we do and what work happened?” he said. “They worry about the business mix, how much of your work was set aside versus not set aside? Quite honestly, what means you got the work by some means other than the 8(a) program, be that a subcontractor to another straight commercial, et cetera. So there are lots of hooks to watch it. Do they audit the books, per se, to check for percentages? That’s less common. But it’s part of your overall review.”
Shoraka added there are a significant number of regulations or requirements to mitigate the risk of pass throughs, and most rules allow for legitimate subcontracting.
One thing all of the experts pointed out is that the program is set up to help the 8(a) firm grow and learn, but they still have to do at least 51% of the work under services contracts and 15% of the work under construction contracts.
Shoraka said what is being lost in this entire discussion is there is more fraud in non-small business socio-economic programs across government than there are in the 8(a) and other small businesses initiatives.The post 8(a) program pushed further to the edge by DoD audit first appeared on Federal News Network. https://federalnewsnetwork.com/defense-news/2026/01/8a-program-pushed-further-to-the-edge-by-dod-audit/
