When you're afraid to publish Steve Vladeck, you're *really* on the wrong side

Now *there's* a template for opinions to follow: "The person claiming to be U.S. Attorney was not validly appointed and has been disqualified. Please refile this action, if appropriate, in the name of a validly appiinted U.S. Attorney. To validly appoint a U.S. Attorney ..."

Today would be a good day to give the Nobel Peace Prize to Tom Hanks.

Democrats still want to win by appealing to people who would make good trial jurors -- you know, set aside prejudices, consider evidence carefully, all that stuff. Republicans win by appealing to people who should never be on a jury. It's a terrible game, but Republicans are definitely good at it

A good trial juror will set prejudices aside, consider only the applicable law and admitted evidence, and decide the case impartially. Democrats try to win with people who would make good jurors. Republicans try to win with people who wouldn't. Republicans understand the game better than Dems do.

Vladeck subscriber confirms and attests to value of subscription

It's the stupid, economy

First rule of wolf safety: don't let your only source of information be an unreliable little boy

If you elect a madman you really shouldn't be surprised when when the result is madness

So the criminal grifter moron who can't tell political asylum from an insane asylum gets elected inmate-in-chief. Only in what used to be America.