🧠 Real case from a recent consultation: A dev team of 5: 1 team lead 1 senior 2 juniors 1 intern The client is frustrated - deadlines keep slipping, tasks are on fire, and Jira is pure chaos 😬 So… what do you think is the real problem here? Curious to hear your take on it.

Don’t over-automate your first workflow Manual is fine at the start. You need to understand the flow first. Then automate with precision.

Build less, reuse more Before writing code, check: → Can we use a library? → An API? → A tool we already built? Fast doesn’t mean hacky. It means smart.

Don’t mimic some SaaS bro with 100-hour weeks. Build for your bandwidth, your phase, your family. Design your company to fit you.

Not everyone wants to ‘scale’ Some devs just want solid, focused work. Not management. Not politics. Not fame. Respect different growth paths.

Junior devs don’t need hand-holding. They need context. Give them real tasks, guardrails, and space to think. Micromanaging kills growth. Trust + feedback = progress.

No, we won’t build your idea for equity. Unless it’s Stripe equity - we work for cash. Your idea might be gold, but until it earns, builders shouldn’t carry the whole risk for you.

It’s never just tech Tech is easy. Process, people, expectations are the hard part.

🚩Red flag: no technical advisor in sight If you're a non-tech founder building SaaS solo, you need a tech-savvy partner or advisor. Otherwise, you're throwing cash into a black hole.

Most MVPs fail not because of low budget - but because founders try to build everything. Cut features -> launch faster

If you do the same thing 3 times for 3 clients - build a template or internal tool. Saves time. Boosts margins. Delivers better results. We did this with a file uploading. After building it 3 different ways - we finally said: “Okay. Let’s make it reusable.” Repeat ≠ boring. Repeat = scal

Don’t let devs pick your tech stack blindly Ask: → Why this stack? → What’s the risk? → How fast can we hire for it? If they can’t answer, they’re playing with shiny toys.

Listen to user behavior more than user words.

Constraints are creative fuel. Less time = better prioritization Less budget = smarter solutions Less people = cleaner process Agree?

Every time I hit “deploy,” I still feel it. Even after years. Will it break? Did we forget something? But I’ve learned: The only thing worse than shipping something broken - is never shipping at all.

You don’t need everyone’s advice Especially from people who’ve never built what you’re building. Choose your voices carefully.

People only see the product. But behind it is: ✔️ Frantic testing ✔️ Budget panic ✔️ Feature cutting ✔️ Google Docs chaos ✔️ Doubt That’s normal. Don't mistake mess for failure. It’s the process.

Founders: you don’t need to build everything. Buy when it's been solved. Build when it’s core. Hack when it’s just to test. Spending $20/month on something proven > 20 dev hours reinventing the wheel.

🧵 Things I wish I knew earlier ✔️ Code is the easy part ✔️ People are the hard part ✔️ Clients forget what they asked for ✔️ You can ship ugly and fix later ✔️ Nobody reads long docs Still learning, every week.

Some founders avoid asking technical questions because they feel dumb. But the smartest founders I work with ask a lot. They want to understand. If your devs make you feel stupid - they’re failing you. Not the other way around.

So many founders ask for dashboards… when they don’t even know which metric matters. Start with a simple CSV or table. Track one thing. When that’s useful, then build UI around it. Dashboards are not magic. Clarity is.

Don’t hire a senior dev if: ✔️ You don’t have a clear product spec ✔️ You can’t review code ✔️ You just “need someone to figure it out” You’ll waste time and burn money. Get a tech advisor first. Then hire with direction.

Most early devs try to “build everything perfectly.” Real-world devs ship within time, budget, team, legacy code. Great devs are resourceful. Not perfect.

Your calendar. Too many inputs = too little output. I killed 80% of my notifications. Emails, Slacks, even some calls. I don't need to know everything right now. I need to think, build and ship 🙏. Want more focus? Start subtracting.

Seen it too many times: someone chooses a fancy stack because it “scales” and ends up buried in dev hell. Your MVP does not need Kubernetes, microservices, or a $500/month pipeline. Complex ≠ professional. What’s the most overkill stack you’ve seen used for a tiny project?

Most “CTOs” at early startups are just... the guy who didn’t leave the group chat.

Productized services > hourly billing. Clients understand scope, you avoid scope creep. Better to sell outcomes, not hours.

Forget endless chats with your “target audience.” People often don’t know what they want. You need to guess it for them. Best way is to build an MVP. Show it. If they pay - idea works. If not – move on. Simple as that.

Don’t make users think too much. I tend to overcomplicate flows, thinking it looked “smart.” But people just want clarity. Build like you're guiding someone who’s tired, distracted, and in a rush. Every step should feel obvious.

A good UX feels invisible. Everything flows. The user doesn’t have to think - they just get results. That’s the goal.

Motivation fades. That’s just how it is. But small actions still move you forward. Win today with one tiny step. Do it again tomorrow.

Every new tool has a cost Yes, even if it’s free. Learning curve, context switching, bugs. The setup tax is real.

Reminder: Taking care of yourself is also a business task. Rest is strategy. Joy is fuel.

Some weeks feel like wins. Some feel like survival. Both are valid. Just don’t quit on a low week.

You’re probably not annoying people by showing up. You’re reminding them you exist. People are busy. Repeat yourself kindly.

I used to stress about sounding “unique” enough. Now I just try to be real and clear. My journey - building a business, coding, raising kids - is already not that common. That’s what makes it worth sharing.

Every mistake teaches me faster than any course. The only “waste” is hiding from it.

I don’t need more goals. I need fewer distractions. Subtraction is a growth strategy.

✔️ Stress check : If I’m overworked, it’s usually because I said yes to the wrong thing. Not because there’s “too much.”

Delegating doesn’t mean vanishing. It means setting the vision, then stepping back - but not out. You’re still the lighthouse.

If you want your team to grow let them own things. Real ownership, not fake “autonomy.” People surprise you when trusted.

Agency cashflow funds my AI project. That’s the trick: turn services into your startup runway. No investors needed (yet). Just margin + patience.

You can be ambitious and gentle. A tech founder and a parent. There’s no rulebook. But there is space for both. I’m proof

Frontend frameworks come and go. Strong fundamentals stay: – Clean architecture – Good UX – Performance habits Tech stacks age, but principles last.

I don’t compare my progress to funded teams with 15 engineers. We’re running a different race. I try to keep my burn low, focus sharp, and build real value.

Bootstrapping = freedom + pressure. You own everything - but you also do everything. It's not for everyone.

Mom guilt is real. Startup guilt is real. Combine both, and you need serious emotional skills. Best cure: presence. When I’m coding, I code. When I’m with my kids, I really am.

My rule: tech for leverage, not novelty. If it saves time, reduces errors, or scales humans - I’m in. If it just demos well... skip.

AI makes it super easy to fake “wow.” Great demos, shiny prototypes, fancy decks ... Hype makes people believe in AI miracles, but what ships is often just... mid. We need less ✨presentation✨, more working products.

Resilience isn’t just pushing through. It’s adapting. Changing the plan. Knowing when to rest. That’s what keeps you in the game.