This is going to be a bitter pill to swallow for the “we don’t need nuclear in Australia” people. Defending a ban on a source of clean energy means fossil fuels and higher bills for longer. The reality is proving (once again) to be the complete opposite of what the politicians promised.

It's water vapour, not smoke! I hope I'm not triggering any nuclear people here.

So-called ‘pro-climate’ organisations like these want to shut down experts talking about nuclear energy in Australia. For them, it’s not about the cause but the industry they lobby for and are paid by. If it was about the cause, they’d support all sources of clean energy including nuclear.

Thanks for the shout-out Simon! I'm proud to be a nuclear fan, in the same way you're a 100% renewable fan. Neither of us are experts but I'd argue you've got a lot more political influence than I do...

Introducing Jordan! As Nuclear for Australia grows, I'm thrilled to welcome Jordan to the team as our Supporter Relations Coordinator.

Never believe a politician who says they're serious about the climate but Australia doesn't need nuclear. The government has had to admit today that current projections suggest they'll only reach 48% emission reduction by 2035 compared to their recently announced target of 62-70%.

Australia’s nuclear ban makes us irrelevant to the rest of the world. India is planning to increase their nuclear power capacity tenfold by 2047. They’re looking to collaborate, yet the outdated ideology of our leaders prevents us.

Australia has lost COP to Turkey 🇹🇷 which is building four nuclear reactors. Whilst it's disappointing we won't have the world's nuclear community in Adelaide, it's reassuring that the Energy Minister will face an irony in Turkey if he tries to shut down global nuclear progress.

Despite saying they listen to experts on energy, many politicians continue to refuse opportunities to meet with Australian nuclear experts. How can you have an informed position on nuclear power without engaging with experts? 📺 Watch my full evidence: vist.ly/4f4qm

Congratulations South Korea 🇰🇷👏 Once again shows that nuclear is needed in the mix to phase out fossil fuels.

The Australian Conservation Foundation argue for a policy would literally be worse for the climate than shutting down all renewables in Australia. They want to shut down Australia's uranium export industry that produces the equivalent clean energy to around 70% of Australia's electricity demand.

Once again, nuclear disinformation goes unchecked by Australian media. This claim that nuclear in Australia would cost $600 billion assumed that nuclear costed more than 5x more than even the CSIRO's estimate. The ABC should issue an apology and correction for repeating it once again.

No, the nuclear power renaissance is not a 'chimera'. 37 countries are at different stages of adding nuclear to the mix according to the United Nations. The head of the International Energy Agency has said “Nuclear power is making a strong comeback”.

If Australia was serious about supporting Singapore why aren’t we assisting on nuclear? Why don’t we share it more with our region if we were serious about becoming a clean energy superpower?

If Australia was serious about supporting Singapore why aren’t we assisting on nuclear? Australia has nuclear expertise and uranium. Why don’t we share it more with our region if we were serious about becoming a clean energy superpower?

Our Energy Minister just posted this. Never mind a cooling tower isn’t a nuclear reactor, what’s more concerning is despite the energy crisis they double down on their refusal to consider nuclear power. We desperately need the affordable, reliable clean energy that only nuclear can provide us.

The nuclear industry mustn't waste this opportunity. That was my message speaking at the Atlantic Council Nuclear Policy Summit. I showcased some of the disinformation Australians were subjected to including three eyed koalas, glowing kangaroos and the claim that 7 reactors would cost $600 bn.

Australia has a third of the world’s uranium. Trump wants to increase nuclear capacity 4x by 2050. Why doesn’t the Prime Minister leverage our uranium to support the US’s decarbonisation?

Fantastic to catch up with @nuclearforaustralia's patron @dicksmithfairgo today to see his new folly and discuss developments in Australia's nuclear debate. We're really grateful for his continued support and personal advocacy.

Reminder: Nuclear plants are built to withstand earthquakes. 20% of reactors worldwide operate safely in areas of major seismic activity. A 5.6 magnitude earthquake is hundreds of times smaller than the biggest earthquakes nuclear plants have withstood. 📚 Facts: nuclearforaustralia.com/facts

BOOK NOW FOR AN EVENING WITH NUCLEAR ENGINEER, MISS AMERICA 2023 GRACE STANKE. 🔗Link in bio. 📍Perth Jan 29 2025 📍Brisbane Jan 31 2025 📍Melbourne Feb 1 2025 📍Adelaide Feb 4 2025 📍Sydney Feb 6 2025 Early bird tickets selling fast for $10. www.nuclearforaustralia.com/Tour?recruit...

I just hugged a nuclear waste canister. It’s full of fuel assemblies which have been used at Sizewell B to provide clean, reliable power for millions of Brits. Importantly, the fuel still retains the majority of its energy meaning this waste could present future opportunities.

Imagine going to a climate conference to protest against the cleanest source of energy 💀

It’s fascinating to see the anti nuclear movement pivot their argument. One year nuclear is bad because it would “kill the coal industry”. The next it’s a smokescreen for the coal industry. One year industry doesn’t back nuclear. The next, industry is having a pervasive influence on the debate.

From the Prime Minister down it is claimed nuclear will be 4% of the grid. The only issue...it's based on dodgy accounting from the 'Smart' Energy Council (a renewable lobby group). It shouldn't take a teenager to work this out... ✍️Sign the petition: nuclearforaustralia.com

Thank you to everyone who joined us on Saturday night!