The comics scene outside of the big two in the 90's was crazy...

Love the people complaining that Christopher Nolan's Odyssey is "Historically inacurrate." This would be a film where they will fight a giant cyclops.

I actually tried to tell someone this one time and they got offended by the notion of not treating the President of the US as some sort of idealized superhero.

I cannot deal with those people who say GDT's Frankenstein looks ugly. Each scene is crafted with the love and care of an intricate painting. You could write a film essay on the use of color alone. Again just showing those that complain about film the most know nothing of film making.

It really is astonishing how a certain segment of perpetually online people cannot handle a film not being perfect in any way to the point where they have to demonize the people making it because it did not live up to some impossible standard.

Because it's *Australia.* Home of a good natured, friendly populace alone with the deadliest wildlife you've ever seen.

I hate that the film ended the way it did, because Jackson's old west gunslinger version of Hercule Poroit would have been an interesting spinoff series.

"Until someone builds a bigger forever roll..."

Early 1980's folks.

Holy f*ck is the other app absolutely miserable. They apparently can't even announce Brainiac as being the villain in Man of Tomorrow without causes hundreds of doomers to swarm the news to whine about how their life sucks.

I don't trust anyone who says GDT's films look ugly. That's just a complete confirmation that they have no clue what they're talking about.

I didn't even realize it was the finale to the Great North until after I watched it. It's sad to see the series go. But it had a long, healthy run. And it's better it bowed out while it was still good before running to the point where it just goes on forever.

No. Namor has a big throne next to Jeff's...

Pfft. People seeing the aurora borealis in the sky. Well, I've got it in my kitchen.

No one should have to be forced to watch any of Pierre Poilievre's interviews....

We joke, but if this film came out in the 90's we would *absolutely* have a strong power ballad that would be part of all the trailers and be like #1 on MTV or VH1 for weeks...

"A source close to the production..." Okay, so, it's a lie. Guys, there's no one official saying this. It's a nameless "source." Which means it's probably no one. Stop falling for stuff like this.

This guy is super weird. Check out his page, and he actively describes himself as a "comedian." But he also hocks crypto currency and the like. So it's an act, but it's sort of done for a particular audience that has a weird sense of humor.

The Shawn Levy hate is just yet another example of how performative a lot of online discourse had become. It's no longer people having fun. They've been driven out. Now it's miserable people engaging in stupid high school "Cool kid" BS to dunk on everything because it makes them feel important.

So one of the big "complaints" with GDT's Frankenstein is that it looks "artificial." Because apparently GDT was supposed to film in *actual* gothic castles, Victorian era science labs and in the arctic rather than build sets for these places.

Missed opportunity for Trump to call it a "Libary."

And now these guys are spinning out because they *clearly* thought they were going to be the dominant "voice" of the conversation and weren't prepared for people pushing back, so now they're crashing out that they are getting people calling them out on their nonsense.

So looks like most of the anti-GDT Frankenstein crowd are obnoxiously pretentious "film snobs" that think liking films in black and white is a personality, along with people who literally don't understand how storytelling or adaptations work.

"Turns out this film I was going to hate before I ever saw it is not that good. *That's the film's fault!* I'm smarter than everyone!"

The biggest problem now regarding AI is that we have people who know nothing about VFX or filmmaking now declaring *anything* that looks a little stylized to be "AI." Just showing the whole situation is rotting brains from both directions.

So I guess "Film Twitter" is mad that GDT's Frankenstein is not a *completely* faithful adaptations of the original novel- you know, like all those other faithful adaptations- and also isn't "feminist" enough,and apparently the VFX work is "bad" and really it's just miserable people being miserable.

The best thing about Kevin Conroy's work is that even though he's sadly no longer with us, his voice is so memorable that you can read a sequence like this and hear his voice and know *exactly* how he'd play the scene.

So film twitter has decided GDT's Frankenstein film is "bad" because.... reasons, I guess?

This just goes to show how performative a lot of online discourse is and how it's not due to a fully developed argument and instead just something they can use to criticize one while praising the other.

Fun fact: Because of Columbo, there was almost a civil war which was only stopped by Peter Falk himself, and Falk also turned down the opportunity to meet the Prime Minster of Japan.

Catching up on how "procedural" shows have evolved over the years with series like "The Rookie," "9-1-1" and the "Chicago" franchise, it's interesting to see how shows try to balance the need for greater "realism" with the need for entertaining melodrama, and what steps they take to address it.

The more I head of this situation, the more sick it makes me. This young woman was unfairly targeted, likely due to racists over her heritage, and they finally got their way. The bad guys one, her career is likely ruined, and everyone suffers.

Watching Chicago Fire is so funny because they keep having these wacky, sitcom style shenanigans with screwball characters, but it's shot with a gritty realistic, single camera style and scored in a very serious manner, which just kind of makes everything feel a bit off...

Too high of a price.

Maybe she just didn't want to comment on how a lot of people got *super* weird about an ad and her body that wasn't saying what they thought it was saying?

Dollars to donuts Buck will be a guy who signs up for the mission that gets him frozen because his wife left him for another guy and he's sad about it...

Given they're AI art, I'm going to say "Not at all."

It's trying to "prove" an argument by making up evidence. MJ is a "bad fit" because she's "not right for him." For proof, here is a scene that deliberately makes their relationship look as horrible as possible and completely broken. It's literally "We'll find proof later."

Incredibles.

Random Twitter Poster: Here is theory about an upcoming Marvel film that probably isn't true. Twitter Doomer: Just light all of Hollywood on fire at this point. It's completely unsalvageable. Nothing is worthwhile anymore. Just let everything burn and be cast away.

Sounds like a you problem.

That's... a *big* leap in logic, Clark...

Gee I wonder who it could be It's the Court of Owls. It's 100% the Court of Owls. It's absolutely going to be the Court of Owls. I don't even read Batman and I know it's going to be the Court of Owls.

So the friend who ended their friendship of 20 years with me over his political views, who is pro-Israel, defended Karlie Chirk, and has been advocating for "Men's rights" recently and was kicked off of *ELON'S* twitter and has moved to Threads... has apparently been kicked off that platform as well

To be fair, they also did that last year and they won.

Yes. That was a major part of their platform. The countries opened their borders because the blip severely reduced their populations. But once the borders were going back up people were being unseated. 1/

You know aside from Daredevil cloaking itself in the verbiage of the Trump era and Thunderbolts* trying to address serious mental health issues.

NCIS.

I was introduced to George Carlin as a kid by the way of Shining Time Station. Seriously, I wanna know who was in charge of *that* casting. He did a great job, he was just... *not* the first choice I'd think of in regards to that role.