OKC THUNDER FOUR FACTORS (47/82) TOR made three more 2-pointers (on 20 more attempts) TOR made one more 3-pointer (on nine fewer attempts) OKC and TOR forced 11 turnovers TOR grabbed seven more offensive rebounds OKC made seven more free throws (on five more attempts) 37-10.

OKC THUNDER FOUR FACTORS (46/82) OKC made four more 2-pointers (on two fewer attempts) IND made nine more 3-pointers (on 12 more attempts) OKC committed one fewer turnover IND grabbed 10 more offensive rebounds OKC made 16 more free throws (on 10 more attempts) 37-9.

OKC THUNDER FOUR FACTORS (45/82) OKC made 11 more 2-pointers (on 14 more attempts) MIL made two more 3-pointers (on five more attempts) OKC committed eight fewer turnovers OKC grabbed two more offensive rebounds OKC made four more free throws (on six more attempts) 37-8.

2025-26 OKC: 82.5% free throw percentage (No. 2 in NBA) Today was only OKC’s fourth game (of 44) shooting below 70% at the line.

OKC THUNDER FOUR FACTORS (44/82) OKC made one more 2-pointer (on 13 fewer attempts) OKC made 15 more 3-pointers (on 12 more attempts) OKC committed 10 fewer turnovers CLE grabbed 13 more offensive rebounds CLE made 15 more free throws (on 15 more attempts) 36-8.

OKC THUNDER FOUR FACTORS (43/82) OKC made eight more 2-pointers (on 13 fewer attempts) MIA made seven more 3-pointers (on 21 more attempts) MIA committed 10 fewer turnovers MIA grabbed 16 more offensive rebounds OKC and MIA each shot 28 free throws 35-8.

OKC THUNDER FOUR FACTORS (42/82) HOU made three more 2-pointers (on 32 more attempts!!!) OKC made nine more 3-pointers (on 17 more attempts) OKC committed three fewer turnovers HOU grabbed 16 more offensive rebounds HOU made one more free throw (on two more attempts) 35-7.

OKC THUNDER FOUR FACTORS (41/82) OKC made 10 more 2-pointers (on three more attempts) SAS made two more 3-pointers (on seven more attempts) OKC and SAS committed 11 turnovers SAS grabbed seven more offensive rebounds OKC made seven more free throws (on three more attempts)

OKC THUNDER FOUR FACTORS (40/82) OKC made 10 more 2-pointers (on nine more attempts) MIA made seven more 3-pointers (on two fewer attempts) OKC committed 10 fewer turnovers OKC grabbed nine more offensive rebounds OKC made 13 more free throws (on 15 more attempts) 33-7.

OKC THUNDER FOUR FACTORS (39/82) OKC made seven more 2-pointers (on seven more attempts) MEM made five more 3-pointers (on four more attempts) OKC committed 11 fewer turnovers MEM grabbed five more offensive rebounds OKC made two more free throws (on four more attempts) 32-7

2025-26 Tyler Tanner SCORING EFFICIENCY: 59.6% 2-pointers, 41.9% 3-pointers, 85.7% free throws PLAYMAKING EFFICIENCY: 134.7 on-court offensive rating, 31.5% assist percentage, 12.8% turnover percentage DEFENSE: 4.8% steal percentage And he’s been better against top-50 opponents than overall.

OKC THUNDER FOUR FACTORS (38/82) UTA made one more 2-pointer (on seven more attempts) UTA made four more 3-pointers (on three more attempts) OKC committed nine fewer turnovers UTA grabbed seven more offensive rebounds OKC made 18 more free throws (on 21 more attempts) 31-7.

For context: 2024-25 OKC’s worst 20-game stretch in the regular season was 15-5.

OKC THUNDER FOUR FACTORS (37/82) OKC made one more 2-pointer (on 13 more attempts) CHA made eight more 3-pointers (on two fewer attempts) OKC committed 13 fewer turnovers OKC grabbed one more offensive rebound CHA made five more free throws (on two fewer attempts) 30-7.

OKC THUNDER FOUR FACTORS (36/82) OKC made 11 more 2-pointers (on 14 more attempts) PHX made seven more 3-pointers (on 11 more attempts) OKC committed six fewer turnovers PHX grabbed 10 more offensive rebounds PHX made four more free throws (on 10 more attempts) 30-6.

OKC THUNDER FOUR FACTORS (35/82) OKC made 13 more 2-pointers (on eight more attempts) OKC made three more threes (on six fewer attempts) OKC committed three fewer turnovers GSW grabbed five more offensive rebounds OKC made two more free throws (on four fewer attempts) 30-5.

2025-26 Shai Gilgeous-Alexander 0-3 feet: 98-for-129 (76.0%), 25.5% assisted 3-10 feet: 65-for-120 (54.2%), 16.9% assisted 10-16 feet: 104-for-176 (59.1%), 15.4% assisted 16 feet to 3-point line: 29-for-60 (48.3%), 0.0% assisted 3-pointers: 68-for-162 (42.0%), 26.5% assisted

OKC THUNDER FOUR FACTORS (34/82) OKC made eight more 2-pointers (on 11 fewer attempts) OKC made two more 3-pointers (on 14 more attempts) OKC committed 10 fewer turnovers POR grabbed seven more offensive rebounds OKC made seven more free throws (on nine more attempts) 29-5.

OKC THUNDER FOUR FACTORS (33/82) OKC made 20 more 2-pointers (on 23 more attempts) ATL made 13 more 3-pointers (on 22 more attempts) OKC committed three fewer turnovers OKC and ATL each grabbed 10 offensive rebounds OKC made 10 more free throws (on six more attempts) 28-5.

OKC THUNDER FOUR FACTORS (32/82) OKC made 22 more 2-pointers (on 19 more attempts) PHI made seven more 3-pointers (on 15 more attempts) OKC committed 10 fewer turnovers PHI grabbed four more offensive rebounds OKC made two more free throws (on four more attempts) 27-5.

OKC THUNDER FOUR FACTORS (31/82) SAS made eight more 2-pointers (on four more attempts) SAS and OKC each made 11 3-pointers (OKC 15 more attempts) OKC committed five fewer turnovers OKC grabbed six more offensive rebounds OKC made one more free throw (on four more attempts)

OKC THUNDER FOUR FACTORS (30/82) OKC made two more 2-pointers (on six more attempts) SAS made four more 3-pointers (on six more attempts) SAS committed five fewer turnovers SAS grabbed one more offensive rebound SAS made 12 more free throws (on 17 more attempts) 26-4.

OKC THUNDER FOUR FACTORS (29/82) OKC made 15 more 2-pointers (on 13 more attempts) MEM made three more 3-pointers (on two more attempts) OKC committed eight fewer turnovers MEM grabbed one more offensive rebound MEM made five more free throws (on nine more attempts) 26-3.

MIN earned tons of free throws from second-chance attempts and off-ball fouls. That’s on the defense.

OKC THUNDER FOUR FACTORS (28/82) OKC made three more 2-pointers (on two more attempts) MIN made two more 3-pointers (on two fewer attempts) OKC committed two fewer turnovers MIN grabbed five more offensive rebounds MIN made five more free throws (on 17 more attempts) 25-3.

2024-25 OKC: 106.6 defensive rating That was 7.0 points/100 lower than No. 15 TOR. 2025-26 OKC: 103.0 defensive rating That is 6.9 points/100 lower than No. 2 DET.

OKC THUNDER FOUR FACTORS (27/82) OKC made eight more twos (on 21 more attempts) OKC made three more threes (on four more attempts) OKC committed 20 fewer turnovers OKC and LAC each grabbed nine offensive rebounds LAC made four more free throws (on six more attempts) 25-2.

2025-26 NBA teams, ordered by largest loss: PHX: 49 MIL: 45 SAC: 41 PHI: 41 UTA: 40 BKN: 36 CHI: 36 MEM: 36 WAS: 35 IND: 35 NOP: 34 DAL: 33 LAL: 29 LAC: 28 POR: 27 ATL: 27 BOS: 27 GSW: 25 TOR: 25 MIN: 23 DET: 21 CLE: 20 ORL: 19 NYK: 17 MIA: 16 SAS: 13, twice HOU: 13 DEN: 10 OKC (both combined): 4

2025-26 OKC losses: More made 2-pointers in both games Fewer made 3-pointers in both games Fewer turnovers committed in both games More offensive rebounds grabbed in one game Fewer made free throws in one game

OKC THUNDER FOUR FACTORS (26/82) OKC made five more 2-pointers (on seven more attempts) SAS made four more 3-pointers (on five more attempts) OKC committed five fewer turnovers SAS grabbed one more offensive rebound OKC and SAS each made 24 free throws 24-…2!

Here’s a wild one. 2025-26 net rating leaders: 1. OKC, +17.2 2. HOU excluding six losses, +17.0 3. BOS excluding 10 losses, +16.8 4. CHA excluding 17 losses, +16.1 5. NYK excluding seven losses, +15.9

2025-26 OKC’s net rating… Overall: +17.2 (No. 1 in NBA) At home: +19.1 (No. 1 in NBA) On the road: +15.4 (No. 1 in NBA) In the first quarter: +20.6 (No. 1 in NBA) In the second quarter: +18.2 (No. 1 in NBA) In the third quarter: +25.2 (No. 1 in NBA)

Total plus-minus leaders, 2025-26 NBA season: 1. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, +359 2. Cason Wallace, +292 3. Ajay Mitchell, +259 4. Chet Holmgren, +250 5. Nikola Jokic, +223

OKC THUNDER FOUR FACTORS (25/82) OKC made seven more 2-pointers (on five fewer attempts) OKC made 12 more 3-pointers (on nine more attempts) OKC committed six fewer turnovers PHX grabbed one more offensive rebound PHX made one more free throw (on four more attempts) 24-1.

2025-26 OKC, no low leverage SGA and Jalen Williams on (71 minutes): +23.7 net rating SGA on, Williams off (640 minutes): +18.6 net rating Williams on, SGA off (66 minutes): +16.7 net rating SGA and Williams off (179 minutes): +17.4 net rating, 93.7 defensive rating

OKC THUNDER FOUR FACTORS (24/82) OKC made two more 2-pointers (on three fewer attempts) OKC made nine more 3-pointers (on six more attempts) OKC committed four fewer turnovers OKC grabbed two more offensive rebounds UTA made one more free throw (on six fewer attempts) 23-1.

OKC THUNDER FOUR FACTORS (23/82) OKC made 10 more 2-pointers (on five more attempts) DAL made four more 3-pointers (on seven more attempts) OKC committed five fewer turnovers DAL grabbed two more offensive rebounds OKC made 13 more free throws (on eight more attempts) 22-1.

2025-26 Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, clutch time: 53.4 minutes 87 points on 69.9% true shooting Nine assists, one turnover +67 plus-minus OKC 9-1 2024-25 SGA, clutch time: 62.1 minutes 67 points on 66.0% true shooting Six assists, three turnovers +32 plus-minus OKC 15-7

OKC THUNDER FOUR FACTORS (22/82) OKC made six more 2-pointers (on six fewer attempts) GSW made three more 3-pointers (on 10 more attempts) OKC and GSW committed 15 turnovers GSW grabbed eight more offensive rebounds OKC made nine more free throws (on 13 more attempts) 21-1.

Best 21-game starts, NBA history 2015-16 GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS: 21-0, +311 point differential (finished 73-9 with +882 point differential, LOST IN NBA FINALS) 1969-70 NEW YORK KNICKS: 20-1, +317 point differential (finished 60-22 with +745 point differential, WON NBA FINALS)

OKC THUNDER FOUR FACTORS (21/82) OKC made 15 more 2-pointers (on 21 more attempts) POR made six more 3-pointers (on 20 more attempts) OKC committed two fewer turnovers POR grabbed five more offensive rebounds POR made four more free throws (on five more attempts) 20-1 (!!!).

OKC THUNDER FOUR FACTORS (20/82) Each team made 27 twos (PHX seven FEWER attempts) Each team made 15 threes (OKC 12 FEWER attempts) OKC committed eight FEWER turnovers PHX grabbed 10 MORE offensive rebounds OKC made four MORE free throws (on four MORE attempts) 19-1.

So far this season, OKC has trailed on 23.87% of all possessions. OKC has led by 18 or more points on 24.02% of all possessions.

2025-26 OKC Thunder High/very high leverage (158 possessions): +45.1 net rating (No. 1 in NBA) Medium leverage (2,985 possessions): +17.7 net rating (No. 1 in NBA) Low leverage (715 possessions): +3.7 net rating (No. 13 in NBA) OKC has played more low leverage than every other team.

Team fouls per game, regular season 2024-25: 18.6 2025-26: 21.5 (most since 2006-07) Team free throw attempts per game, regular season 2024-25: 21.7 2025-26: 25.2 (most since 2006-07) OKC’s aggressiveness/turnover creation has changed the league-wide landscape.

MIN: 73 points on 37 3-point attempts + 37 free-throw attempts, 68.5% true shooting OKC: 51 points on 26 3-point attempts + 38 free-throw attempts, 59.7% true shooting Timberwolves had a much, much better shooting night.

OKC THUNDER FOUR FACTORS (19/82) OKC made 15 MORE 2-pointers (on 12 MORE attempts) MIN made 10 MORE 3-pointers (on 11 MORE attempts) OKC committed seven FEWER turnovers MIN grabbed six MORE offensive rebounds OKC made eight MORE free throws (on one MORE attempt) 18-1.

2025-26 OKC Thunder First five games (all without Isaiah Joe): 112.3 offensive rating, 28.8% 3-point percentage Last 13 games (all with Isaiah Joe): 124.2 offensive rating, 39.0% 3-point percentage

OKC Thunder four factors (18/82) OKC made eight MORE twos (on five MORE attempts) OKC made three MORE threes (on 11 FEWER attempts) OKC committed two FEWER turnovers POR grabbed three MORE offensive rebounds OKC made two MORE free throws (on two MORE attempts) 17-1.

OKC Thunder four factors (17/82) OKC made six MORE 2-pointers (on five more attempts) OKC made seven MORE 3-pointers (on one FEWER attempt) OKC committed 14 FEWER turnovers UTA grabbed nine MORE offensive rebounds UTA made one MORE free throw (on one fewer attempt) 16-1.