The Supreme Court has ruled in Trump’s favor 90% of the time—often in secret, without a word. That’s not justice. That’s a shadow government. And John Roberts is at the helm.

Texas tried to erase voters of color—again. A court said: unconstitutional. But the fight isn’t over. Abbott is pushing the case to SCOTUS, hoping Trump’s justices give him a win anyway. This is about power—not fairness. Tell Congress: Stop gerrymandering. Pass the Redistricting Reform Act.

$4.75M in unreported gifts. Private real estate deals. Yacht vacations. Luxury flights. That’s not a billionaire influencer. That’s Justice Clarence Thomas under the influence of billionaires. SCOTUS needs an enforceable code of ethics.

Chief Justice John Roberts broke the Voting Rights Act. Legalized partisan gerrymandering. Unleashed billionaires in our elections. Shielded ICE’s racial profiling. Backed Trump 90%+ of the time on the shadow docket. And people still consider him a “moderate.”

Reminder: Trump has won nearly every case he’s brought to the Supreme Court. If they finally say no on tariffs, it’s not bravery. It’s optics. Don’t fall for the “moderate Roberts” myth. He’s just as committed to MAGA’s agenda—he’s just more careful with the PR.

It’s not just about Trump. Roberts built a court that expects presidents to break the law — and protects them when they do. What happened to checks and balances?

What happens in L.A. won’t stay in L.A. What happens in Chicago won’t stay in Chicago. What happens in New York won’t stay in New York. What happens in Charlotte won’t stay in Charlotte. The Supreme Court OK’ed racial profiling for ICE. ICE is attacking US citizens. Authoritarianism is happening.

Even if Trump loses the tariffs case, it doesn’t erase the immunity ruling. Or the abortion bans. Or the voter roll purges. The MAGA majority on the Court has already done its damage. One “no” doesn’t balance the scales.

A Trump-appointed judge blocked Texas’ racial gerrymander. Read that again. Even he said it went too far. Now Trump’s MAGA-packed Supreme Court —led by John Roberts, who gutted the Voting Rights Act— gets to decide if it stands anyway. This isn’t neutral. It’s engineered.

If this sounds wild to you, brace yourself: it’s not hypothetical. The Roberts’ Court said a president could literally deploy SEAL Team 6 against a rival and be criminally immune. This isn’t checks and balances. It’s full‑blown executive impunity.

Let’s stop pretending John Roberts is some moderate saving democracy. He gutted voting rights. Greenlit gerrymandering. Shielded billionaires. And now he’s built a Court that rubber-stamps Trump’s every move. This crisis didn’t appear overnight. It was designed.

Republicans in Texas tried to draw five new GOP seats by slicing up Black and Latino communities. A federal court said: Nope. That’s illegal racial gerrymandering. Now they’re running to SCOTUS for backup. This is about power—not representation.

Trump says if his tariffs are struck down, it’ll be a disaster. For who? For him? What’s actually a disaster is letting any president bypass Congress and make up trade laws on the fly. This isn’t leadership. It’s lawlessness.

Texas Republicans are telling on themselves. They say the map was “only partisan,” not racial. But it only targeted Black and Latino districts. That’s not a defense—it’s a confession. And now they want SCOTUS to bless it.

Reminder: The Supreme Court ended Roe. They blocked student debt relief. They gave Trump immunity. Now they’re eyeing obliterating the Voting Rights Act. We must be LOUD. Silence is what they want.

SCOTUS could give Trump a blank check to shut the border to asylum seekers. Even those legally arriving at ports of entry. This isn’t about "security." It’s about stripping rights from desperate people and expanding unchecked executive power.

SCOTUS gave ICE the green light to ignore the Constitution. Non-criminal, contributing members of society are being hunted in broad daylight.

We know what happens when the Supreme Court gets involved in voting rights: Shelby. Brnovich. Allen. And now: Louisiana v. Callais. Every time, they chip away at our freedom to vote. This time, they might just break it.

The Supreme Court is about to rule on whether Louisiana can gerrymander Black voters out of existence. That’s not hyperbole — that’s what Louisiana v. Callais is. This case could be the end of the Voting Rights Act as we know it. Democracy is on the line.

Asylum law isn’t a technicality. It’s a human right. Noem v. Al Otro Lado could blow it up by redefining “arrival” to mean only after the U.S. says so. The Supreme Court could rule that if you’re on the border, you’re not really here. And not really protected.

The lower courts said ICE raids violated the Constitution. The Supreme Court said: do it anyway. Now in Chicago? People arrested in parks. On job sites. At immigration hearings. 97.4% with no record but detained anyway. SCOTUS is helping shred the Constitution piece by piece.

97.4% of immigrants detained in Chicago had no criminal record. They weren’t the “worst of the worst.” They were daycare workers, landscapers, cab drivers. The Roberts Court says that’s fine. They greenlit racial profiling, and called it law.

Let’s be clear: This case is part of the same project that already… 🔴 Separated families 🔴 Caged kids 🔴 Blocked asylum for domestic violence survivors 🔴 Forced people into dangerous camps in Mexico Now SCOTUS may help rewrite the law to make all of it permanent.

We gathered at the Supreme Court to say what should never have been up for debate: ⚖️ No one is above the law. Not even the president. ⚖️

This case is terrifying. Can the U.S. block asylum-seekers on the Mexican side of the border, and act like they never came? The Trump admin says yes. The 9th Circuit said no: that would “radically contract” asylum rights. Now it’s up to SCOTUS. We’ve seen this 6–3 movie before.

🚨 Stacked by Trump. 🚨 Funded by billionaires. 🚨 Delivering wins for the powerful, losses for everyone else. People see it. Legitimacy is gone. Remember: The Roberts Court isn’t misunderstood—it’s doing exactly what it was built to do.

We expect Trump to ignore the rules. We expect him to abuse executive power. But the Supreme Court is supposed to stop that. Instead, they’re letting it happen—again and again. That’s not checks and balances. That’s complicity.

They say they’re pro-family. They say they’re pro-life. Meanwhile, Trump’s lawyers fought in court to deny food to poor families—during a shutdown he created. He lost. But never forget: they all stood behind him.

Lawyers don’t usually march. But these aren’t usual times. TODAY we’re rallying outside the Supreme Court because: 🟥 Trump is attacking the rule of law. 🟥 SCOTUS is helping him do it. 🟥 And the legal system only works if we fight for it. We’re done waiting.

“The rule of law hasn’t crumbled,” says Amy Coney Barrett. Ask the immigrant families ICE is kidnapping in broad daylight. Ask the judges Trump ignores. Ask anyone watching the Roberts Court bend over for a wannabe dictator.

Remember: The Roberts Court isn’t misunderstood—it’s doing exactly what it was built to do. Trump’s justices weren’t chosen for fairness. They were chosen to rule for him. And they’re doing just that.

Trump incited an insurrection. He’s weaponized the presidency. He’s threatened judges who try to stop him. And SCOTUS? They've given him a pass. Every time. Tomorrow, we take the fight to their doorstep. Join us.

The SNAP fight may be over—but never forget. Trump was literally fighting in court to withhold food from families & veterans during a shutdown he caused—all while partying at Mar-a-Lago. And the Roberts Court almost helped him do it. Only Justice Jackson dissented.

The SNAP stay got extended. But something unusual happened. The order doesn’t say Justice Jackson referred it to the full Court. That’s the tell. It means Jackson not only dissented—she made sure no one mistook her for going along with it. A quiet message with big implications.

Lawyers. Law students. Legal advocates. We’re gathering at the Supreme Court to say what should never have been up for debate: ⚖️ No one is above the law. Not even the president. ⚖️ The Court has enabled Trump’s authoritarianism long enough. We’re showing up to say: ENOUGH. 11/15. Join us.

John Roberts says the Supreme Court is “neutral”. But when they back Trump on: ✅ Abortion Bans ✅ Book Bans ✅ Military Occupation of Cities ✅ Letting Families Starve ✅ Racial Profiling ✅ Trump’s Immunity ...we’re supposed to believe that’s fair? Spare us.

SCOTUS refused to stop Tremane Wood’s execution. Even though the jury was rigged. Prosecutors lied. His lawyer was on cocaine. His brother confessed but only got life. Oklahoma’s pardon board said: spare him. Only Justice Jackson dissented. Let that sink in.

SCOTUS avoided a political firestorm by rejecting Kim Davis’ case. But let’s be real: ✅The bans are still on the books. ✅The Court is still stacked with extremists. ✅And the MAGA legal machine is still hunting for the right case to take marriage equality down.

Trump says he needs the Guard to help DHS in Chicago. But that’s not how the law works. If the Supreme Court sign off on this, what’s left to stop martial law? We’re not talking about hypotheticals anymore.

If SCOTUS signs off on Trump’s National Guard argument, they won’t just be rewriting a law, they’ll be writing a blank check for any president to militarize policing in any city they choose. Using the U.S. military against its own citizens is NOT public safety. That’s authoritarian drift.

SCOTUS just paused a ruling that would’ve required Trump’s admin to fully fund SNAP benefits during the shutdown. His lawyers argued feeding people during a shutdown is “a mockery of the separation of powers.” Let that sink in. Starving families? Apparently, that’s just fine.

Trump is literally suing to stop veterans, kids, and elderly Americans from getting full SNAP benefits—on Veterans Day. Meanwhile, food drives are popping up on the decks of warships. This isn’t patriotism. It’s policy-made starvation.

Trump isn’t just refusing to feed veterans — he’s dragging the Supreme Court into it. He’s gone to them twice in one week to block food benefits that millions, including 1.2 million veterans, rely on. He knows this Court serves him, not the people.

You don’t “support the troops” while suing to starve them. You don’t get to wave the flag while gutting the programs that veterans rely on to survive. Veterans deserve better. America deserves better.

Trump found money for billionaires and private jets. But for veterans who served this country? He’s blocking food benefits that are already funded — forcing families in uniform to line up for groceries. That’s Trump’s version of “supporting the troops.”

This Veterans Day, 1.2 million veterans are being told: “No food for you. Go ask a food bank.” All because Donald Trump is blocking their SNAP benefits, the food assistance program that helps them survive.

Today the Supreme Court let marriage equality stand. Good. But Kim Davis’ appeal wasn’t a fluke. It’s part of a broader plan to roll back LGBTQ+ rights — one case, one justice, one headline at a time. We can't afford to sleep on this.

A Reagan-appointed judge just gave up his lifetime seat so he could speak freely about Trump. His message? Trump is using the law for partisan purposes. He says Trump is doing “overtly and routinely” what Nixon only dared to do in secret. This isn’t politics. It's a warning.

“Silence, for me, is now intolerable.” A Reagan-appointed judge just resigned to warn us: Trump is weaponizing the rule of law “for partisan purposes, targeting his adversaries while sparing his friends and donors from investigation, prosecution, and possible punishment.”

SCOTUS declined Kim Davis’s desperate plea to overturn Obergefell. That’s not a win. It’s a reminder. They didn’t need this case — because they’re already chipping away at LGBTQ+ rights through backdoors: 📚 Book bans 🛐 Religious exemptions 🚫 Anti-trans rulings