loading . . . Burned Furs, Puriteens, and Furryâs Real Golden Age _This article was originally a Twitter thread from 2021. With X/Twitter setting itself on fire, it occurred to me that itâd be useful to pull it into an actual blog post. Iâve updated a few bits and âdethreadedâ it for publication here._
* * *
So the Burned Furs come up every so often in The Discourse.⢠And Iâd like to talk about how theyâre both exactly what you think and way more than you think. Gamergate, the Sad Puppies, Bronies for Trumpâwe had it all ahead of schedule, writ small and stupid.
In some ways, the BFs came out of arguments furry is still having now. Should we be more circumspect about sexy-stuff in general and fetishes in particular? Should the Shame Nun angrily chant and ring bells at us for our contemptible tolerance of disgusting things? If this sounds like an earlier take on the âpuriteensâ of the present moment, well, bingo. Charla âSquee Ratâ Trotman would probably have objected even then to being described that way, but if the foo shits, right? When I first wrote this, I thought Squee Rat was 15 or 16 when she wrote this, but Wikipedia claims she was born in 1978. In fact, Squee Rat was only 19 or 20 when she wrote her âSordid Little Businessâ broadside that effectively kicked off the Burned Furs. She didnât start the BFs, but she defined their ranting, angry tone.
Hereâs the thing: âSordidâ isnât just a profane rant, itâs a _weird_ profane rant. Thereâs a paragraph or two complaining about zoophiles, another about âplushophiles,â but the vast bulk of the article is about what she saw as the _real_ evil: Furry Lifestylers. Furry what? We donât use that term much now, but it rolls up a lot. I mean, a _lot._
Back in the relatively early days of science fiction fandom (say, the 1950s and 60s) there were two somewhat tongue-in-cheek camps, âFIAWOLâ (Fandom is a way of life) and âFIJAGHâ (Fandom is just a goddamn hobby). Arguably, âfurry lifestylerâ was our version of FIAWOL. Even in the early days of furry, some people deeply identified with their fursonas. There were âfurry housesâ like the Prancing Skiltaire.
So âlifestylerâ encompasses anything that involves seeing furry as deeper than âcartoon animals are cool.â Otherkin, definitely. But to the Burned Furs and Squee Rat, it encompassed just wishing you were an animal. Deeply personal fursonas. And, uh, being vegan. Seriously, she wrote more words railing about vegans than about zoophiles. `#priorities`
So on the one hand, âSordidâ is deeply immature, and on the other, kind of bonkers. Sure, furry _was_ (and remains) full of adult and fetish material. But it argues the true scourge, the evil whose inclusion would surely doom furry to the trash heap of pop culture history, was: plushophile vegans.
Anyway, âCoyote Nateâ Patrin wrote the actual Burned Fur Mission Statement, which also calls out bestiality, plushophilia, and fursuit sex. I donât know if Iâd call that manifesto and its supplemental FAQ either excessively puritanical or overtly homophobic, but letâs put a pin in that for a moment.
I _would,_ however, call them whiny, in the âI donât care if this stuff is here but why do I have to see it and if other people see it theyâll think all furry is like this so actually I do careâ way we see in current puriteen crusaders. Also, the FAQ caps on vegans again, because while furry has nothing to do with your self-identity it apparently has everything to do with your diet. Interestingly, theyâre also focused on commercial prospects: there was a perception at the time that furry was getting a bad rap in the animation and comics industries. Once youâre branded with the Scarlet F, kid, youâll Never Work In This Town Again!
So, back to that pin. The mission statement began by bemoaning ââalternative lifestyleâ groups associated with [furry], many of whom have little interest inâ¦anthropomorphic art, stories, costumes, etc.â And acts the Burned Furs âstrongly discourage the support ofâ included not just bestiality, plushophilia, and fursuit sex, but âother things seen as âwrongâ by non-fandom individuals.â I canât _prove_ this was meant as a homophobic dog whistle, but letâs be blunt: itâs sure easy to hear it as one. And this is where things get even more complicated.
See, while you know the name âBurned Furs,â what you might not know is that they had an antecedent, the âTake Back Our Fandom Brigadeâ fomented by _Gallery_ editor Rich Chandler:
> Well, frankly, I think itâs time we collectively said âEnough is Enough!â Things are not going to get better by themselves. Tolerance and political correctness and even manners be damned, we have to reclaim our fandom.
This raises immediate questions: reclaim it _from_ who and _for_ who? It rested on the dubious idea that there had been a âgolden age of furryâ which had _already passed by the mid-1990s_ due to all the pr0nz.
Oh, you mean all the naked vixens?
_Oh, no, those are fine._
Then I guess you mean the weird Nazi-adjacent imagery, with the obvious uniform and heavy weaponry fetishesâ
_No, no, we donât mean that._
(Angry goose meme) WHAT KIND DO YOU MEAN, THEN, FUCKER? Uh-huh.
The folks in Southern Californiaâthe late Mark Merlino and his partner Rod OâRiley, founders of the Prancing Skiltaireâwho organized the first furry parties and the first furry con were self-described lifestylers, and openly gay/bi/poly. Furry started out entwined with queer communities, and started out being pretty frankly sexual. (The first furry-as-we-know-it comic was arguably Reed Wallerâs _Omaha the Cat Dancer,_ whose first appearance was in the funny animal APA _Vootie_ in 1978.)
And some people hated that furries were so damn open about sexing up their cartoon animals, were so brazenly queer-friendly, were so _visibly weird._ They hated that being tied to those dirty dirty furries might affect their prospects in the animation industry. At least in theory, they werenât anti-queer prudes (Chandler would repeatedly point out he identified as bisexual, so he couldnât _possibly_ be queerphobic); in practice, though, they _really hated_ that furry was, yes, so damn queer. That it wasnât, for an increasing number of people, just a goddamn hobby.
And _these_ were the guysâall (cis white) guys, as far as I knowâwith the reactionary, Gamergate-foreshadowing vibe. They didnât do a lot before this except grumble, but the Burned Furs gave a vindication of their views! And had attention! And wanted members! Despite their protests to the contrary, the BFs obviously _did_ want gatekeepers in furrydom. Furry needed people who would force all the undesirables back into the closet and/or out of the subculture entirely, and _obviously_ only the people who saw the problem were qualified to be those gatekeepers.
So while the Burned Furs didnât start as a conservative power play to Make Furry Great Again, thatâs what they became. Some people still genuinely believe it was about âimproving furry,â but, well. Some people still genuinely believe Gamergate was about ethics in game journalism.
The most charitable reading of their premise is that furry shouldnât be about your identity, but just about the art. I actually get it; long ago, I bristled at the idea that it was about anything more myself, and I was concerned about how easy it was to find adult art. (I didnât want to suppress it, but I didnât want it to be peopleâs first experience with furry.) But I realized, thankfully quickly, that furry was _always_ about both art _and_ identity. Telling people how they can and canât identify is a mean-spirited, ugly proposition. And ultimately, a losing one.
So it isnât surprising that the Burned Furs, er, burned out. Nate Patrin became a professional music journalist, writing for _Pitchfork, Stereogum,_ and _Spin,_ among others. (The article I linked, âItâs Hard to Tell Who Is Real in Here: On being tired of fighting over taste,â takes on a decided ironic cast now, doesnât it.) In a truly glorious example of Bet You Didnât See This Coming, C. Spike âSquee Ratâ Trotman became an award-winning publisher of erotic comics. Neither of them want to discuss furry anymore, which, you know, fair. Trotmanâs company nonetheless produced and distributed Tracy Butlerâs âLackadaisyâ short film; Iâm not sure if that means sheâs forgiven furry, or if she would strenuously argue that âLackadaisyâ isnât furry, it just has, you know, anthropomorphic animals in adult situations. (I guess itâs okay because theyâre not vegan.)
One of the founders of the Burned Furs known for his love of German military imagery in his art, Eric Blumrich, was always on the political far left. I donât know what that means, but it seems amiss not to note the absurdity.
Some other Burned Furs, TBOFs, and BF-adjacent types like Chandler joined Gamergate and/or the Sad Puppies, because of fucking course they did. Each movement rested on near-identical paranoid conservative fantasies of restoring an imagined Golden Age now under existential threat. Our modern fannish purity culture isnât quite the sameâas Vox notes, itâs often spearheaded by people whoâd otherwise describe themselves as liberal, and stems from an inability (or unwillingness) to distinguish between real-world harm and fictional harmâbut the similarities are clear.
Itâs ironic that an anti-diversity group started with a young black womanâs rantâbut furryâs full of cis white males, and the reactionaries saw a chance to say âfollow us or youâre doomed.â We didnât. And it turns out weâre still hereâbigger and better than ever. Weâre more diverse, more creative, and frankly, more popular and accepted.
Sure, weâre still a work in progress. But at least in the eyes of this giant cat who was really there all that time ago, the closest weâve ever had to a Golden Age in Furry is now. https://giants-club.net/articles/burned-furs/