New blogpost on transversal allegory being a figure of institutions belonging to a new semiotic order that originates in black-box architectures of network technologies. The commons as vectors / acc. www.minasmongrel.xyz/blog/kujawa-...

phenomenal www.nts.live/shows/kelman...

Yeah, you tell these thick mathematicians who they really are, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich!

Sarah Davachi's organ drones are perfect for limitless grey of Eastern European fall into winter.

Kathy Acker on imagination, terrorism and the Luigi Mangione event

When all that's know is sick, the unknown has to look better.

It's an accelerationist phenomenon that the algorithmic media circuit has to intensify the cuteness of the shooter to make unaliving a CEO a viral.

Does anyone know any work that'd map Hegel and complexity theory onto each other (that is not Negarestani)?

Internet feels now like early Harmony Korine, like Xenia, Ohio in Gummo, a town just hit by a tornado, nothing worth to do, no work, no fun, nowhere to go, mostly just weirdos and abuse

Correction: the fifth continent is Digitality - Information is only its one dimension but it bifurcates into another dimension that is Structure (excavated by structuralism).

Celine writes a noise novel also because every human being is a liar and a deceiver, with intent or aimlessly. A counter-Kantian world that persists on the web of ruin and mendacity.

I really enjoyed this essay (and its structure), especially the approach that a combination of materialism and semiotics - which seems to be less popular today - is necessary "to escape the ideological subordination of thought to the reproduction of social structures".

Freud opened up the fourth continent of the Unconscious, and computers (from Turing to transformers) have unlocked the fifth continent of Information.

It begins with a harrowing description of shellshock and artillery injuries sustained in a WWI battle set on a French farmhouse - literary machine for both Freudian trauma and mental state of noise that Malaspina speaks about a lot.

I'm reading Celine. His 'Death on the installment plan' was excellent, only Bernhard can complete with his spite

It was a dark night for pirates.

It's hard to on both sites, there's no point to just copy-paste and I need to differentiate the perspective between the accounts to get my brain engaged, so I'll try posting two things here: 1] just more loose thoughts; 2] and Deleuze-focused content. Let's see how it's going to work.

Which one to read next: "War" by Louis-Ferdinand Celine or sth from Faulkner? I'm slightly inclined to Celine because I haven't read a naughty French boy in some time, but then I've haven't read anything by Faulkner yet and that's a dishonour.

HBO show about three romantic flatmates in 1790s Tübingen trying to continue the legacy of reclusive mentor, who fall out in the first season and by season three have right and left young disciples across Prussia. Sex, drugs & intrigues to complete the system of German Idealism...

I'd probably agree, though I didn't read OOO in years. But also I am much more sympathetic towards idealism these days because of how dogmatic contemporary materialism has become with its flattening all structures into one topology where again "everything connects to everything".

Being 25% into this great course through complexity I think of necessary caution toward realist impulse to affirm agency to any emergent system (Latour) - "anything is an agent and negotiates with everything" ultimately knocks out tools of critique (such as the molar/molecular).

Marguerite Porete slayed with this title

The disruption of popular knowledge and information practices with noise is intentional.

"All the blows, the wounds and the mutilations are like a stone thrown at us by the hand of Christ. Bread and stone are love. If we have any armour which is able to protect our soul from the stones thrown by Christ, we should take it off and cast it away."

I seems that already Yung Hegel did not sully his multi-storey conceptual meatgrinder with a single example, application or implementation that we simple earthlings could find helpful. Is this is perverse anti-representationalism?

Ending every my essay with a disclaimer

I wrote a socratic fanfic anime dialogue relaying Puella Magi Madoka Magica through cyberfeminism, cute/acc and mysticism to ask whether love between two magical girls - against technocapital, destiny and time - is possible... www.sum.si/journal-arti...

We could distinguish two types of the Outside: a static, context-independent, wave of the Outside that humanity may or may not tap into; & a dynamic, contextual, fold of the Outside that bursts into force in contact with humans, runaway process but sensitive to our rituals.

The feed-types management and creation functions are great and make me feel this actually might work here. Technology is libidinal.

The irresistible urge to start reading new books at 30% of completion of the last five opened is the recurrence of the Book of Job <silent scream>

I just saw one of the "baby fashion" genAI videos with a slurry of automated bot comments like "Incredible😍😍😍". While your are writing your Intelligence and Spirit vol. 2, we have already entered the David Roden's Disconnection of Unbounded Non-Sapient Horrors Scenario.

I never was fully sold on the tool kit or toy model metaphors: the first reduces theory's transformational power to use value; the second disregards that conceptual compression opens new thought spaces. I prefer philosophy as Bildungsroman, crystal ball or particle collider.

To address alien logic/thought/subject is to assume a non-flat difference, a difference of discontinuity or the discrete, and so it has to reintroduce the problem of mediation: what is the medium of alien intervention? how is the reason framed by the alien (and backwards)?

let's go!

Well, to use this platform I'm going to have to learn portuguese which is fine, I always liked it's sound

A kingdom for a translator embedded in this platform's interface

Isn't a symptom something between a regularity and a rule? It inflicts a compulsory behaviour that cannot be eliminated by will, but at the same time it can be understood in relation to trauma as an error that makes life miserable, and so correctable with experimentation.