Anđela Šoškić (@asoskic.bsky.social)

In theory, a scientific paper should tell you how to repeat the study, but in practice that’s often hard, especially when methods get complicated. Writing guidelines and checklists have helped, but the problem is surprisingly stubborn (e.g. in EEG: link.springer.com/article/10.1...)

loading . . .

How to do Better N400 Studies: Reproducibility, Consistency and Adherence to Research Standards in the Existing Literature - Neuropsychology Review Given the complexity of ERP recording and processing pipeline, the resulting variability of methodological options, and the potential for these decisions to influence study outcomes, it is important t... https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11065-021-09513-4