Ken Shirakawa
@kencan7749.bsky.social
📤 16
📥 38
📝 15
Ph.D. candidate in Kyoto university and ATR/ Brain decoding / fMRI / neuroAI / neuroscience
And here’s an experimental podcast-style of paper summary, generated via Notebook LM directed by me! Link:
notebooklm.google.com/notebook/9c8...
add a skeleton here at some point
4 months ago
0
0
0
Our paper is now accepted at Neural Networks! This work builds on our previous threads in X, updated with deeper analyses. We revisit brain-to-image reconstruction using NSD + diffusion models—and ask: do they really reconstruct what we perceive? Paper:
doi.org/10.1016/j.ne...
đź§µ1/12
loading . . .
Redirecting
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2025.107515
4 months ago
1
3
3
reposted by
Ken Shirakawa
arxiv cs.CV
5 months ago
Yukiyasu Kamitani, Misato Tanaka, Ken Shirakawa Visual Image Reconstruction from Brain Activity via Latent Representation
https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.08429
0
4
3
reposted by
Ken Shirakawa
Martin Hebart
10 months ago
One big issue with some of the previous claims are that NSD, the massive 7T fMRI dataset of 1000s of images, might not be the right dataset to test these hypotheses. The reason is that it is built on MSCoCo and has too high similarity between training and test.
arxiv.org/abs/2405.10078
16/n
loading . . .
https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.1007816/n
1
6
1
I’m currently concerned about what the brain’s encoding model predicts. Given that the target brain state is collected under naturalistic condition and the inputs of encoding model derived from a deep neural network, I am not sure what the predictions are actually represent.
11 months ago
0
0
0
arxiv.org/abs/2405.10078
loading . . .
Spurious reconstruction from brain activity
Advances in brain decoding, particularly visual image reconstruction, have sparked discussions about the societal implications and ethical considerations of neurotechnology. As these methods aim to re...
https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.10078
11 months ago
0
0
0
you reached the end!!
feeds!
log in