Delaying the assertion of European Beverage rights can be costly. In Marriage of Martinez & Camou, the Court of Appeal upheld $20,000 in sanctions after an eight-month delay increased litigation costs. Read more: https://www.dailyjournal.com/dar/285739-marriage-of-martinez-camou

Nearly every felony prosecution in Los Angeles County's East District passes through Judge Rob B. Villeza’s courtroom. Discover how his dedication to preparation and collaboration shapes criminal justice. Read more: https://www.dailyjournal.com/judicial_profiles/11035

NOAA's review of the California Coastal Commission could end where these fights usually do: in court. Brian Kabateck and Shant Karnikian lay out the Administrative Procedure Act angle in this clip — full breakdown on Off The Record. Listen: https://ow.ly/1ECq50ZlPLB

California’s appellate court clarified: self-represented litigants can’t recover sanctions for their own time, but Code Civ. Proc. § 2023.050 may require a $1,000 sanction for certain discovery abuses. Civility matters in every case. Details: https://ow.ly/Gs2I50Zmf66

Decloedt v. RadNet Management: The California Court of Appeal held that harassment based on an employee's sexual orientation is harassment because of sex under FEHA, affirming the denial of a motion to compel arbitration under the EFAA. https://ow.ly/mcPC50ZlO2G

Commissioner Aleen Avanesian believes preparation and patience go hand in hand. Her courtroom philosophy centers on listening first, guiding the process, and ensuring litigants feel heard. Read her judicial profile. https://www.dailyjournal.com/judicial_profiles/11034

The California Court of Appeal in People v. Tyler clarified that the “could be convicted” standard doesn’t apply at a Penal Code 1172.6(d) resentencing hearing. The court affirmed the denial, emphasizing the correct burden of proof. Read more: https://www.dailyjournal.com/dar/285727-people-v-tyler

Judge Maria Jhai says the best decisions begin with listening, not assumptions. Learn how her background in anthropology, the Innocence Clinic, and federal prosecution continues to shape her approach on the bench. https://www.dailyjournal.com/judicial_profiles/11033

Uber and CA trial lawyers faced a costly ballot fight—until SB 623. Watch Brian Kabateck's message to his own profession: "There are bad actors out there... this should be the ultimate wake-up call to the plaintiff's bar." Full episode breaks down the new medical lien cap. https://ow.ly/THgV50ZkRJB

Can a state law remove a general partner after a Chapter 11 filing? The Ninth Circuit BAP held that 11 U.S.C. § 541(c)(1)(B) preempts California Corporations Code sections 15906.3 and 15906.5. https://ow.ly/BZVC50ZkR88

In People v. Espino, the California Supreme Court held that a prior prison term enhancement remaining in the judgment is still "imposed" under Penal Code §1172.75, even when the punishment was stricken, making the defendant eligible for resentencing. https://ow.ly/b2eu50ZjRQI

A freeway shooting became a defining chapter in Judge Bryan Clavecilla's life. His judicial profile reveals how that experience shaped the perspective he brings to the courtroom. https://www.dailyjournal.com/judicial_profiles/11032

In Smith v. Superior Court (Tesla, Inc.), the California Court of Appeal held plaintiffs alleging racial discrimination and harassment arising from the same alleged workplace policy at a single factory could join their claims under CCP §378. Read the court's analysis: https://ow.ly/FNGF50ZjqzV

A warehouse burns for 8 days. 85M lbs of frozen food gone. Toxic smoke over a working-class neighborhood for 2 weeks. Who's liable? The latest Off the Record — Kabateck & Karnikian break it down. Watch now. tinyurl.com/bdcrc2v5

Judge Benjamin A. Azar says a life-changing loss led him to the law and ultimately the bench. That calling still shapes his courtroom today, where respect and hope are central to every hearing. Read his Judicial Profile: https://ow.ly/oca450ZiReI #JudicialProfile #CaliforniaCourts

A California appellate court affirmed that an attorney-client agreement was unenforceable where the firm's failure to obtain informed written consent under Rule 1.7(b) made the agreement void as against public policy. Analysis: https://www.dailyjournal.com/dar/285706-doe-1-v-mcgrath-kavinoky-llp

The U.S. Supreme Court held that obtaining Google's location history through a geofence warrant is a Fourth Amendment search. The case was remanded for consideration of whether the warrant satisfied probable cause and particularity requirements. https://ow.ly/kCHX50Zitkg

Judge Gassia Apkarian brings years of criminal bench experience to today's civil calendar. Discover how that background shapes her perspective on fairness, preparation, and resolving disputes. https://www.dailyjournal.com/judicial_profiles/11030 #Judiciary #CivilLitigation

Can an “imminent peril” theory make a transit agency liable? After settling with the SUV driver, the plaintiff claimed an LACMTA bus driver’s actions led to a rollover crash. LACMTA denied all liability. See how the court ruled: https://ow.ly/Ii7K50ZhMEh

In re I.H.: The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed that a reasonable mistake of identity supported probable cause to arrest. Before officers knew beyond a reasonable doubt the arrest was mistaken, the juvenile indicated he had a weapon, supporting the search. https://ow.ly/HNTh50ZhLNZ

🎙️ New episode of Kabateck & Karnikian: Off the Record, on the Daily Journal Network. California spent $25M suing the Trump administration and preserved $108–188 billion in federal funding for the state. Kabateck and Karnikian on why the math works. Full episode: https://ow.ly/4qZT50ZhJRn

A California appellate court upheld that a law firm wasn’t disqualified after briefly hiring an attorney from the opposing party—because the attorney was screened, no confidential info was shared, and employment ended quickly. Read more: https://ow.ly/nUBP50ZhoaM

CA Court of Appeal: Not every document triggers attorney duties to stop review. In Popa v. Simpson, disqualification was reversed—memo wasn’t obviously privileged or inadvertently produced. Key takeaway for discovery disputes: relevance and privilege matter. https://ow.ly/ahY850ZgrBo

The Rodney King riots prompted Amanda Park to pursue law school. Decades later, she serves on the Los Angeles Superior Court, where she handles family law matters with a focus on listening, preparation, and fairness. Read her profile: https://www.dailyjournal.com/judicial_profiles/11029

People v. Sacco: The Court of Appeal affirmed the denial of mental health diversion under PC § 1001.36, concluding substantial evidence supported the finding that the defendant’s diagnosed mental disorder was not a significant factor in the charged financial crimes. https://ow.ly/sCLR50Zg3fq

FIFA reclassified World Cup seats after selling them, bumping buyers down while sponsors got the prime spots. California AG Rob Bonta is now demanding answers. Kabateck and Karnikian break down why FIFA's defense may not survive state consumer law. Watch and listen: https://ow.ly/Yr4h50Zfoe2

In McCarthy v. Hernandez, the U.S. Supreme Court held that AEDPA did not permit federal habeas relief because no clearly established Supreme Court precedent required a jury instruction on attenuation principles derived from Missouri v. Seibert. https://ow.ly/o3Kv50Zfqw8

Years representing domestic violence survivors, a commitment to hearing both sides, and a reputation for careful preparation all shape Commissioner Erika Diaz’s approach to Family Law. Her profile offers a closer look at the experiences behind the bench. https://ow.ly/KLRH50ZeqU1

In Taduran v. James R. Glidewell, Dental Ceramics, the California Court of Appeal affirmed a reduced PAGA penalty award, holding that Labor Code section 2699(e)(2) does not require courts to calculate penalty reductions on a per-pay-period basis. https://ow.ly/kZZb50ZeswK

In Cesar Puga v. City of Riverside, et al., the court rejected Fourth Amendment and ADA claims stemming from officers’ response to a self-inflicted gunshot incident, finding no reasonable jury could rule for the plaintiff. Subscriber Exclusive: https://ow.ly/Wfrv50ZeqWK

The Ninth Circuit held in Yurok Tribe v. Klamath Water Users Assoc. that ESA Section 7 applies to Klamath Project operations and that compliance isn’t a judicial taking since it doesn’t adjudicate water rights. Full analysis: https://ow.ly/UiYE50ZcV3k

Can debtors keep their home after a foreclosure auction if the 15-day bidding window isn’t over? In re Tinsley says yes—the sale wasn’t final, so debtors could seek lien avoidance. Full case: https://www.dailyjournal.com/dar/285649-in-re-donald-ray-tinsley-and-angela-june-tinsley

People v. Russo: The Court of Appeal upheld denial of mental health diversion under Penal Code § 1001.36, finding the defendant’s proposed treatment was no different from the one that failed before. Read more: https://ow.ly/qJxa50Zc3cq

Judge Michael Frye prosecuted serious crimes for decades. Now, one of the highlights of his week is watching drug court participants rebuild their lives. His profile explores how justice, mercy, and humility guide his work on the bench. https://www.dailyjournal.com/judicial_profiles/11027

People v. Bustillos reversed an upper-term sentence imposed at resentencing after a probation violation, holding that SB 567’s requirements applied because the case was not yet final on appeal. https://www.dailyjournal.com/dar/285638-people-v-bustillos

UCLA's locked into the Rose Bowl through 2044—so why are two officials accused of communicating with SoFi about a move? Pasadena spent hundreds of millions and is now suing the Regents. Ep. 2 of Off the Record, on the new Daily Journal Network: youtu.be/2LZmVYdFK3A

Justice Stacy Boulware Eurie’s journey spans constitutional litigation, juvenile justice, and statewide leadership. See how her experience shapes her work at the 3rd District Court of Appeal. Read more: https://www.dailyjournal.com/judicial_profiles/11026 #JudicialProfile #AppellateLaw

SCOTUS reversed the Second Circuit in FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd., holding that ICA Section 47(b) does not create an implied private right of action. The provision governs rescission as a remedy, not a cause of action. https://ow.ly/SyRS50ZaJyh

The court in In re Tung Trust held that a trust's 30-day survivorship provision did not clearly override California's antilapse statute. The Court of Appeal reversed a ruling that the gift had lapsed after the beneficiary predeceased the settlor. https://ow.ly/9IvJ50ZacHn

Judge Georgia Huerta says people rarely fit the assumptions others make about them. That perspective, shaped by her upbringing and decades in public service, still influences how she approaches every case today. Explore the full profile: https://ow.ly/s4K450Z9Z3V

Judge Michael Kelley says some of his best legal thinking happens while writing. That process has shaped a judicial philosophy centered on clarity, fairness, and public trust. His profile is well worth the read. https://www.dailyjournal.com/judicial_profiles/11024

Does awarding a spouse the family home and "all debts thereon" require removing the other spouse from a joint mortgage? The Court of Appeal in Marriage of McConnell and Jahnke says no—unless the agreement clearly requires it. https://ow.ly/iXIt50Z93yK

Judge Kenneth R. McDaniel’s own childhood in family court now shapes his work on the bench. His unique perspective brings empathy, trust, and stability to families facing tough transitions. Read more: https://www.dailyjournal.com/judicial_profiles/11023

The Supreme Court in Sripetch v. SEC ruled that disgorgement under 15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(5) doesn’t require proof of investor losses. The focus: stripping wrongdoers of unjust gains. Full analysis: dailyjournal.com/dar/285613-sripetch-v-securities-and-exchange-commission #SecuritiesLaw #SECEnforcement

Judge Helen H. Yang brings compassion and focus to family court, earning respect for her preparation and dedication to children’s well-being. Read her profile. Subscription only: https://www.dailyjournal.com/judicial_profiles/11022 #FamilyLaw #Judiciary #CaliforniaCourts

Ninth Circuit (en banc) reverses default forfeiture: Once standing isn’t reasonably in dispute, a claim can’t be stricken for insufficient Rule G(6) interrogatory responses. Read more (subscription): https://www.dailyjournal.com/dar/285606-u-s-v-1-106-775-in-u-s-currency

Justice Thomas DeSantos’s journey from Hanford to the appellate bench shows how community roots shape a judge’s perspective. Discover how his background influences his approach to justice. Read the full profile. Subscription only. https://ow.ly/zxXI50Z6sT2

Did animal imagery in a prosecutor’s argument violate the California Racial Justice Act? The California Supreme Court in People v. Demolle found calling a defendant a “predator” and “wolf in sheep’s clothing” did not violate the RJA. Subscription only: https://ow.ly/JO3n50Z6ru4

People v. Haddock: Reversed. In an RJA new trial motion, the trial court had to accept the allegations as true at the prima facie stage. Prejudice was not part of that inquiry. Subscription only. https://www.dailyjournal.com/dar/285595-people-v-haddock #RacialJusticeAct #CaliforniaCriminalLaw

The California Supreme Court says bad-faith blanket challenges under CCP § 170.6 may face separation-of-powers objections. Read the court’s analysis: https://ow.ly/RSNm50Z5oXf #CCP1706 #JudicialDisqualification #CaliforniaSupremeCourt