Ironically during the original negotiations it was the EU (especially France and Macron) that wanted to keep defence more separate. He regularly told us - we can have a great relationship on defence etc but on Brexit & trade it will be painful. As Martin says, it's not that simple...(1/3)

This is an interesting (& somewhat crazy chart) from the OECD Global Dept Report out today. Huge amounts of additional borrowing from corporates not shifting the dial on investment. www.oecd.org/en/publicati...

Agreed with Jill on this. One budget would make sense, just look at the swings in UK borrowing costs we've seen this year. I can though understand the case for two budgets. What I really can't see the case for is one budget with two separate forecasts per year. Always a terrible idea.

In this work we have (for 1st time?!) estimated share of UK announced infrastructure projects that never go ahead - 37%!! Based on data from 2010-15, 16% of announced projects get scrapped while a further 21% get stuck in planning/preconstruction stage for over a decade.

This is a superb report and thread. If we want a playbook for how to do this, it is in our own history. From 1947 to 1979 the British state successfully coordinated a gargantuan programme of infrastructure development (water, gas, electricity) and housebuilding.

🚨New research🚨 out today from us at BCG Centre for Growth – based on current project pipeline next 5 years could see £700-£900bn invested across 8 key sectors. This is 2.1x-2.7x level in past 5 years. Huge opportunity for the UK. But... 1/ www.bcg.com/united-kingd...

Finally made the move over from the other place! Starting off with a recent piece I wrote about what the Chancellor needs to do to deliver on growth ambitions. A big part is, focus on delivery & implementation (often the hardest things in govt) (1/2) www.linkedin.com/pulse/easier...

bsky.app/profile/rrup... Anyone interested in growth, politics, the EU and much more should follow Raoul