Perhaps the Committee on Publication Ethics might include in its guidelines: When an article is retracted, publishers should notify authors of all papers which have cited it.

We might ask similar questions about training, orders, guidelines, discipline and whistleblowing at ICE.

Has anyone publicised incentive structures in ICE - such as quotas, targets and bonuses? Is there scope for these systems to be challenged in court?

RR: Rigorous Review. RPR: Rigorous Part-Review. Competent, useful critical appraisal does not necessarily need a "peer" as regards ability to assess more than one aspect of a research article - or to cover more than one aspect. PRR: Positive Rigorous Review. PR2: Positive Rigorous Part-Review.

Could a US legal expert provide information/views on this, or give context - What are the duties of members of the US armed forces if ordered to: a) consider, b) plan, c) prepare for, d) facilitate, or e) give purported justification for action which would be unlawful if carried out?

Could a US legal expert provide information/views on this, or give context - What are the duties of members of the US armed forces if ordered to: a) consider, b) plan, c) prepare for, d) facilitate, or e) give purported justification for action which would be unlawful if carried out?

RR: Rigorous Review. RPR: Rigorous Part-Review. Competent, useful critical appraisal does not necessarily need a "peer" as regards ability to assess more than one aspect of a research article - or to cover more than one aspect. PRR: Positive Rigorous Review. PR2: Positive Rigorous Part-Review.

Degenerative "AI".

Also: the more that statistics on serious attacks are dominated by those who know each other, the less relevance to most people's safety.

It's perhaps worth noting that even when we don't know where we may be wrong, we may still be able to think about how to guess at sources of uncertainty - such as by thinking about - how we've been biased in the past, - what mistakes others have made, - how we have defined key concepts and ...

Let's think of other ways to conceptualise this. "Unlimited irresponsibility" "Unlimited damage potential" "Unlimited recklessness" "Limited liability" concerns the welfare of the offender, rather than others.

Let's take a little time to consider what Trump and his allies may be doing behind the scenes, in the form for instance of instructions to agencies on surveillance.

If your government has a realistic plan in case of a sudden and massive disruption to fossil fuel supply (through war or otherwise): It can probably use a lot of that plan now for the climate crisis. If it doesn't have that plan: It's probably failing on both counts.

SINO: Science In Name Only.

Yes, it's important for people to understand climate effects of outsourcing to other countries (including both emissions and lost forests). Also material footprint (end of article) www.escoe.ac.uk/the-uks-hidd... and pollution/habitat destruction effects of outsourced manufacturing/farming.

"Adding up some domestic emissions that your largely service economy causes and going on about "net zero" without telling people each time what you are talking about is a bit like paying your poorer neighbour to burn your rubbish and implying you haven't caused any smoke." Is that fair?

Climate impacts of a country on others, in addition to domestic emissions, include impacts caused or partially caused outside its borders, through for example: Outsourced emissions Shipping, aviation Subsidiaries Financing pollution Failure of companies/governments to warn of dangers Military

Shall we call traditional peer review (for example, secret, only involving a couple of reviewers who may not between them have all the required skills, knowledge and experience, and unpaid) initial peer review: IPR?

Shall we say "published article" (or "draft" if the authors prefer) instead of "preprint" if it's published on the internet, and "traditionally published" or "published with a claim of initial peer review" if it's traditionally "published"?

If people expert in research methods publicise lists of research they have assessed as adequate and at least potentially significant, that might help focus attention on deserving work, and less on work that's very-difficult-to-assess-regardless-of-expertise. bsky.app/profile/matt...

Some astronomy words Showsun/Sunshow/Revealsun/Sunreveal/Seesun/Sunsee/Uncoversun/Sununcover/HRS (Horizon Reveals Sun) Hidesun/Suncover/Coversun/HHS (Horizon Hides Sun) Showmoon/Hidemoon/Mooncover etc.

Moonpass The Moon always overtakes Earth on the outside. This is usually a Full Moon; sometimes a Shademoon/Part Shademoon (lunar eclipse). Passmoon Earth always overtakes the Moon on the outside. A New Moon; sometimes a total/partial Moonsun/Sunmoon/Sunblock (solar eclipse).

Is the bigger threat "AI" or "IA", InAttention?

"If there are two steps in my argument and each has 70% probability then I am probably wrong. 70/100 x 70/100 = 4900/10000 = 49%." web.archive.org/web/20081121...

"If there are two steps in my argument and each has 70% probability then I am probably wrong. 70/100 x 70/100 = 4900/10000 = 49%." web.archive.org/web/20081121...

Shall we say "published article" (or "draft" if the authors prefer) instead of "preprint" if it's published on the internet, and "traditionally published" or "published with a claim of initial peer review" if it's traditionally "published"?

These "central estimates" for global average temperature are out of line with any normal or sane approach to risk. Think of the % chances you're happy to take action, or pay, to avoid as regards plane travel, crime, health, insurance and so on.

And it's not just the average global temperature rise that's important - it's, for example: higher rises in some places, and temperature differences between places causing weather disruption, and these, and the speed of change, disrupt ecological systems.

Politician: Voters won't let me do what I think is right/science says on animal welfare/climate/environment/refugees. Journalist can ask: Are you not experienced in persuasion? Are you not paid to be a leader? Are you giving voters the relevant facts?

Shall we call traditional peer review (for example, secret, only involving a couple of reviewers who may not between them have all the required skills, knowledge and experience, and unpaid) initial peer review: IPR?

Is the bigger threat "AI" or "IA", InAttention?

More than one ethical problem here: "For the purposes of these Regulations, “Misconduct” means all and any behaviour...which Council shall in its reasonable discretion consider to be seriously injurious to the reputation or interests of the Society." royalsociety.org/-/media/abou...

"all Fellows and Foreign Members are expected to follow the Nolan principles of public life, namely: selflessness, integrity, objectivity, accountability, openness, honesty and leadership." royalsociety.org/-/media/abou...

When is the Caracas Oil Party?

"all Fellows and Foreign Members are expected to follow the Nolan principles of public life, namely: selflessness, integrity, objectivity, accountability, openness, honesty and leadership." royalsociety.org/-/media/abou...

More than one ethical problem here: "For the purposes of these Regulations, “Misconduct” means all and any behaviour...which Council shall in its reasonable discretion consider to be seriously injurious to the reputation or interests of the Society." royalsociety.org/-/media/abou...

I'm thinking more of a set of findings endorsed by statisticians/methodologists etc with "we are unable to find any serious flaws here, so this is worth citing" rather than examples.

I'm wondering if academic papers might usefully include a "Due Diligence Declaration" to the effect that authors have taken reasonable, perhaps for some purposes specified, steps to try to ensure both their own work and the work they cite are adequate.

In a field where evidence suggests that a high proportion of papers have serious flaws, a database of "potentially important" papers which appear *not* to have serious flaws might be useful, as well as identifying those that do.

"World leaders and others have misled that the SDGs are "transformative" and "supremely ambitious" and so on when in fact they are less ambitious than pre-existing, key UN goals on water and sanitation for 2020 and 2025." web.archive.org/web/20221026...

We can ask when citation is justified, and also what is justifiable to say about the earlier work when citing it. Should researchers note a general apparent level of reliability/unreliability within the field, or which papers they have checked for comments on post-publication peer review sites?

A mistake too big to correct?

Moonahead Jupiter now shows ~where we've reached, in Gemini, as we orbit the Sun (Earth/Jupiter orbits are slightly inclined). Also, today's half moon (15.48 GMT) will be in the ~direction of our orbit round the Sun (within ~10 moon "widths": Moon's orbit is inclined to the orbit round the Sun).

Happy Nirjup today, and happy Passjup tomorrow! We overtake Jupiter about every 13 months. The "nearest" time and the "overtaking" time are different because of the orbital paths. Tomorrow Jupiter will be sopposite (sort-of-opposite) the Sun: the orbits are inclined.

Moonahead Jupiter now shows ~where we've reached, in Gemini, as we orbit the Sun (Earth/Jupiter orbits are slightly inclined). Also, today's half moon (15.48 GMT) will be in the ~direction of our orbit round the Sun (within ~10 moon "widths": Moon's orbit is inclined to the orbit round the Sun).

Moonpass The Moon always overtakes Earth on the outside. This is usually a Full Moon; sometimes a Shademoon/Part Shademoon (lunar eclipse). Passmoon Earth always overtakes the Moon on the outside. A New Moon; sometimes a total/partial Moonsun/Sunmoon/Sunblock (solar eclipse).

Some astronomy words Showsun/Sunshow/Revealsun/Sunreveal/Seesun/Sunsee/Uncoversun/Sununcover/HRS (Horizon Reveals Sun) Hidesun/Suncover/Coversun/HHS (Horizon Hides Sun) Showmoon/Hidemoon/Mooncover etc.

Happy Nirjup today, and happy Passjup tomorrow! We overtake Jupiter about every 13 months. The "nearest" time and the "overtaking" time are different because of the orbital paths. Tomorrow Jupiter will be sopposite (sort-of-opposite) the Sun: the orbits are inclined.

From 2003: "the mortality flaw and the inflation flaw....may have contributed to the devising of policies which, though they made the statistics look better, made the condition of poor people worse." econpapers.repec.org/paper/prampr...

From 2003: "the mortality flaw and the inflation flaw....may have contributed to the devising of policies which, though they made the statistics look better, made the condition of poor people worse." econpapers.repec.org/paper/prampr...