David B. Wong reviews Chris Fraser’s “Zhuāngzǐ: Ways of Wandering the Way” for ETHICS at doi.org/10.1086/738313 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Scott A. Anderson reviews Tom Dougherty’s “Consent Under Duress” for ETHICS at doi.org/10.1086/738306 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Brendan de Kenessey reviews Nicolas Cornell’s “Wrongs and Rights Come Apart” for ETHICS at doi.org/10.1086/738305 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Chris Bousquet and Tyler Colby Re review Elizabeth Anderson’s “Hijacked: How Neoliberalism Turned the Work Ethic Against Workers and How Workers Can Take It Back” for ETHICS at doi.org/10.1086/738304 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Michal Masny discusses Eden Lin’s “Welfare Invariabilism” in the ETHICS Discussion, “Does the Same Theory of Welfare Apply to All Welfare Subjects? at doi.org/10.1086/738318 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Acts simultaneously required – and wrong. Can blame be placed? Margaret Shea explores in “Blameworthy Required Acts and Deontic Status Tracing” at doi.org/10.1086/738311 philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Theodore Naylor explores bodily autonomy, sovereignty, and decision-making authority for the aging person in “Persons, Authority, and Advance Directives” at doi.org/10.1086/738303 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

“What We May Expect of Each Other” by Benjamin Kiesewetter at doi.org/10.1086/738316 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

ETHICS Free Article: “A Dilemma for Expressive Arguments Against Markets” - Julian David Jonker asks “Are there any viable expressive arguments in ethics in general and about markets in particular?” at: doi.org/10.1086/738309 philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

What does our small corner of an expansive universe have to say about robust realism? Luke Elson explores in “The Size of the Universe Against Robust Realism” at doi.org/10.1086/738320 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Must states use money collected through taxation to pay for goods and services, or is there another way? “Sin, Tyranny, and the Metaphysics of Money” by David Birks and Ian Carroll at: doi.org/10.1086/738317 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

The January 2026 issue of ETHICS is now available on the University of Chicago Press site www.journals.uchicago.edu/toc/et/2026/... #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

An ETHICS Discussion on Marcello Di Bello and Collin O’Neil’s, “Profile Evidence, Fairness, and the Risks of Mistaken Convictions” by Nevin Climenhaga “Unequal Risks of Mistaken Conviction Are Unavoidable: Why Profile Evidence Is Not Uniquely Unfair” at doi.org/10.1086/736739 #philsky

What are we trying to figure out when we are trying to figure out what to do? Matthew Silverstein answer in The Aim of Practical Reasoning at doi.org/10.1086/736747 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Is feasibility relevant to our deliberations? Hallvard Sandven explores in Feasibility: Superfluous or Moralized at doi.org/10.1086/736744 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Do our beliefs about others gain ethical significance from other attitudes? Z Quanbeck argues for in The Constitutive Inheritance Account of the Ethical Significance of Belief at doi.org/10.1086/736735 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Capturing our changing perspectives on love: David North’s You’ve Changed! at doi.org/10.1086/736730 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Exploring conflicts between discrimination and noncomplicity: Scott Altman’s Discrimination, Noncomplicity, and Reasons That Mask Disdain free at doi.org/10.1086/736746 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Our AI Policy has now been posted: www.journals.uchicago.edu/journals/et/...

The ETHICS annual editorial from Douglas W. Portmore, discussing quicker decision times and coming guidelines for AI use at the journal, free at: doi.org/10.1086/736441 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Hilkje Charlotte Hänel reviews Naomi Zack’s “Intersectionality: A Philosophical Framework” for ETHICS at doi.org/10.1086/736745 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Robert C. Hughes reviews W. Bradley Wendel’s “Canceling Lawyers: Case Studies of Accountability, Toleration, and Regret” for ETHICS at doi.org/10.1086/736737 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Laura Silva reviews Krista K. Thomason’s “Dancing with the Devil: Why Bad Feelings Make Life Good” for ETHICS at doi.org/10.1086/736732 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Collis Tahzib reviews Gina Schouten’s “The Anatomy of Justice: On the Shape, Substance, and Power of Liberal Egalitarianism” for ETHICS at doi.org/10.1086/736748 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Kimberly Ann Harris reviews Melvin L. Rogers’s “The Darkened Light of Faith: Race, Democracy, and Freedom in African American Political Thought” for ETHICS at doi.org/10.1086/736738 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Enzo Rossi reviews Shmuel Nili’s “Philosophizing the Indefensible: Strategic Political Theory” for ETHICS at doi.org/10.1086/736740 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Jake Wojtowicz reviews Paddy McQueen’s “Regret” for ETHICS at doi.org/10.1086/736734 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Michael Blake reviews Chandran Kukathas’s “Immigration and Freedom” for ETHICS at doi.org/10.1086/736736 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Cécile Fabre reviews Helen Frowe and Derek Matravers’s “Stones and Lives: The Ethics of Protecting Heritage in War” for ETHICS at doi.org/10.1086/736741 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Nikolas Kirby reviews Avihay Dorfman and Alon Harel’s “Reclaiming the Public” for ETHICS at doi.org/10.1086/736733 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Nadia Urbinati reviews Charles R. Beitz “For The People? Democratic Representation in America” for ETHICS at doi.org/10.1086/736743 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Continuing: The PEASoup Blog/ETHICS discussion peasoupblog.com/2025/10/disc... on Discrimination, Noncomplicity, and Reasons That Mask Disdain, a free article by Scott Altman at doi.org/10.1086/736746 with a précis by Alan Patten philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy

Please join in The PEASoup Blog/ETHICS discussion peasoupblog.com/2025/10/disc... on Discrimination, Noncomplicity, and Reasons That Mask Disdain, a free article by Scott Altman at doi.org/10.1086/736746 with a précis by Alan Patten philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy

Starting Tomorrow - the ETHICS/PEASoup Blog Discussion, peasoupblog.com/2025/10/anno..., on Discrimination, Noncomplicity, and Reasons That Mask Disdain, a free article by Scott Altman at doi.org/10.1086/736746 a précis by at peasoupblo philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil

The upcoming ETHICS/PEASoup Blog Discussion, peasoupblog.com/2025/10/anno..., on Discrimination, Noncomplicity, and Reasons That Mask Disdain, a free article by Scott Altman at doi.org/10.1086/736746, with a précis by Alan Patten philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy

An ETHICS Discussion on Marcello Di Bello and Collin O’Neil’s, “Profile Evidence, Fairness, and the Risks of Mistaken Convictions” by Nevin Climenhaga “Unequal Risks of Mistaken Conviction Are Unavoidable: Why Profile Evidence Is Not Uniquely Unfair” at doi.org/10.1086/736739 #philsky

What are we trying to figure out when we are trying to figure out what to do? Matthew Silverstein answer in The Aim of Practical Reasoning at doi.org/10.1086/736747 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Announcing the upcoming ETHICS/PEASoup Blog Discussion, peasoupblog.com/2025/10/anno..., on Discrimination, Noncomplicity, and Reasons That Mask Disdain, a free article by Scott Altman at doi.org/10.1086/736746, with a précis by Alan Patten philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy

Is feasibility relevant to our deliberations? Hallvard Sandven explores in Feasibility: Superfluous or Moralized at doi.org/10.1086/736744 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Do our beliefs about others gain ethical significance from other attitudes? Z Quanbeck argues for in The Constitutive Inheritance Account of the Ethical Significance of Belief at doi.org/10.1086/736735 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Capturing our changing perspectives on love: David North’s You’ve Changed! At: doi.org/10.1086/736730 philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Exploring conflicts between discrimination and noncomplicity: Scott Altman’s Discrimination, Noncomplicity, and Reasons That Mask Disdain free at: doi.org/10.1086/736746 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

The ETHICS annual editorial from Douglas W. Portmore, discussing quicker decision times and coming guidelines for AI use at the journal, free at: doi.org/10.1086/736441 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

The October 2025 issue of ETHICS is now available on the University of Chicago Press site www.journals.uchicago.edu/toc/et/2025/... #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Morality: From Error to Fiction by Richard Joyce gets an ETHICS review by Christopher Cowie at doi.org/10.1086/735378 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Daniel Drucker reviews Allan Hazlett’s The Epistemology of Desire and the Problem of Nihilism for ETHICS at doi.org/10.1086/735384 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Dennis Klimchuk reviews Christopher Essert’s Property Law in the Society of Equals for ETHICS at doi.org/10.1086/735376 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Sebastian Schmidt reviews Cameron Boult’s Epistemic Blame: The Nature and Norms of Epistemic Relationships for ETHICS at doi.org/10.1086/735381 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

Should we prefer democracy over alternative social orders? Jonathan Benson’s Intelligent Democracy: Answering the New Democratic Scepticism gets an ETHICS review from Kai Spiekermann at doi.org/10.1086/735380 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy

“a whole new set of conceptual tools to start rebuilding the philosophy of language” – Bianca Cepollaro reviews David Beaver and Jason Stanley’s The Politics of Language for ETHICS at doi.org/10.1086/735382 #philsky #PolTheory #legalphil #moralphil #moralphilosophy #legalphilosophy